Skip to content
JudgmentPEESAM LIMITED VS Public Procurement Regulatory Authority1 min read

PEESAM LIMITED VS Public Procurement Regulatory Authority

High Court at Milimani High Court · · Jairus Ngaah

I have considered the applicant's application dated 5 August 2024 filed under a certificate of urgency of even date. Considering that the court is on recess,  and the application is not filed under this Honourable Court's Vacation Rules, there is no basis for certification of the application as urgent. Nonetheless, leave is granted in terms of prayer 1 and 2 of the chamber summons for the applicant to file a substantive motion for judicial review reliefs. I direct that the substantive motion be filed and served within 7 days of the date of this ruling. The respondent will file and serve its response within 7 days of the date of service of the applicant's motion. The application shall be mentioned in the new term particularly on, 30 September 2024 for purposes of taking directions on its hearing. It is so ordered.
    PEESAM LIMITED VS Public Procurement Regulatory Authority PEESAM LIMITED VS Public Procurement Regulatory Authority