Skip to content
JudgmentThe Republic AND ALPHONCE M. KAIO VS State Law1 min read

The Republic AND ALPHONCE M. KAIO VS State Law

High Court at Milimani High Court · · Jairus Ngaah

Two applications are before court; they are summons both dated 25 March 2024 filed under certificates of urgency of even date. The first application is for admission of the second application for disposal during this Honourable Court's Easter recess. The application is certified urgent and allowed. With respect of the second application, the same is allowed to the extent that the applicant is allowed to file a substantive motion for judicial review in terms of prayer (2) of the application. I direct that the substantive motion be filed and served within 7 days of the date of this ruling. The respondents and interested parties are directed to file and serve their response within 7 days of the date of service of the applicant's application. The main motion shall be mentioned on 17 April 2024 for directions on the manner of its disposal. It is so ordered.
    The Republic AND ALPHONCE M. KAIO VS State Law The Republic AND ALPHONCE M. KAIO VS State Law