Skip to content
JudgmentSPECICOM TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED VS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF THE JUDICIARY AND 3 Others1 min read

SPECICOM TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED VS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF THE JUDICIARY AND 3 Others

High Court at Milimani High Court · · Jairus Ngaah

I have read the applicant's application dated 12 June 2024 filed under a certificate of urgency of even date. By dint of section 175 (3) of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act, 2015 the application is certified urgent. Leave is also granted in terms of prayers 2 (a), (b), (c), and (d) of the chamber summons. The substantive motion shall be filed and served within 3 days of the date of this ruling. The respondents are directed to file and serve their response within 3 days of the date of service of the applicant's motion. The substantive motion shall be disposed of by way of written submissions and in this regard:

1. The applicant's submissions shall be filed and served within 3 days of the date of service of the respondent's response.

2. The respondent's submissions shall be filed and served within 3 days of the date of service of the applicant's submissions.

3. Highlighting of submissions shall be on 26 June 2024.

Orders accordingly.

    SPECICOM TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED VS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF THE JUDICIARY AND 3 Others SPECICOM TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED VS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF THE JUDICIARY AND 3 Others