Skip to content
JudgmentRICHARD MURIUKI NJAGI VS SHEILA CHELANGAT TERER AND DANIEL WACHIRA ADRIAN AND 2 Others1 min read

RICHARD MURIUKI NJAGI VS SHEILA CHELANGAT TERER AND DANIEL WACHIRA ADRIAN AND 2 Others

High Court at Milimani High Court · · M.S.Shariff

RULING
1. The Applicant has approached this court vide a Chamber Summons dated 31st August 2026, supported by an affidavit of Fredrick Otieno Mege Esquire Advocate sworn on even date and premised upon Rule 3(2) of the High Court (Practice and Procedure Rules. Part 1 of the High Court (Practice and Procedure Rules and Section IO of the Judicature Act CAP 8 Laws of Kenya, and all other enabling Provisions of Law, wherein he craves for admissions of his Notice of Motion of even date for hearing during the High Court vacation.
2. In the substantive motion, the Applicant craves for enlargement of time to lodge an appeal and for orders of stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 27.7.2026 in Milimani CMCC/E042/2021 pending appeal.
3. Upon due consideration of this application, and the affidavit sworn in support thereof, I do find that the Appellant’s Notice of Motion dated 31st August 2026 merits this court’s consideration during the High Court Recess, and I therefore admit it as such for hearing.
IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED
Delivered, Signed and Dated at Milimani this 7th day of September 2026.
M. S. Shariff
Judge