Skip to content
JudgmentJIHAN FREIGHTERS LTD VS TELCOM KENYA LIMITED1 min read

JIHAN FREIGHTERS LTD VS TELCOM KENYA LIMITED

High Court at Milimani High Court · · M.S.Shariff

RULING
1. The Appellant has approached this court vide a Chamber Summons dated 26Th August 2026, supported by an affidavit of Jude Ragot Esquire Advocate sworn on even date and premised upon Rule 3(2) of the High Court (Practice and Procedure Rules. Part 1 of the High Court (Practice and Procedure Rules and Section IO of the Judicature Act CAP 8 Laws of Kenya, and all other enabling Provisions of Law, wherein it craves for admissions of it’s Notice of Motion of even date for hearing during the High Court vacation.
2. In the substantive motion, the Appellant craves for orders of stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 1.8.2025 in Milimani SCCC/E5849/2024 pending inter partes hearing of it’s motion and eventually pending appeal.
3. Upon due consideration of this application, and the affidavit sworn in support thereof, I do find that the Appellant’s Notice of Motion dated 26th August 2026 merits this court’s consideration during the High Court vacation, and I therefore admit it as such for hearing.
IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED
Delivered, Signed and Dated at Milimani this 28th day of August 2026.
M. S. Shariff
Judge
    JIHAN FREIGHTERS LTD VS TELCOM KENYA LIMITED JIHAN FREIGHTERS LTD VS TELCOM KENYA LIMITED