Skip to content
JudgmentDANIEL MWAURA WANJIKU VS MOLYN INVESTMENTS LIMITED1 min read

DANIEL MWAURA WANJIKU VS MOLYN INVESTMENTS LIMITED

High Court at Milimani High Court · · M.S.Shariff

RULING
1. The Appellant has approached this court vide a Chamber Summons dated 1st September 2026, supported by an affidavit of Kithure Solomon Esquire Advocate sworn on even date and premised upon Rule 3(2) of the High Court (Practice and Procedure Rules. Part 1 of the High Court (Practice and Procedure Rules and Section IO of the Judicature Act CAP 8 Laws of Kenya, and all other enabling Provisions of Law, wherein it craves for admissions of it’s Notice of Motion of even date for hearing during the High Court vacation.
2. In the substantive motion, the Appellant is craving for orders of stay of execution of the ruling delivered on 31.7.2026 in Milimani SCCC/E1174/2026 pending inter partes hearing of it’s motion and eventually pending appeal.
3. Upon due consideration of this application, and the affidavit sworn in support thereof, I do find that the Appellant’s Notice of Motion dated 1st September 2026 merits this court’s consideration during the vacation, and I therefore admit it as such for hearing.
IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED
Delivered, Signed and Dated at Milimani this 2nd day of September 2026.
M. S. Shariff
Judge
    DANIEL MWAURA WANJIKU VS MOLYN INVESTMENTS LIMITED DANIEL MWAURA WANJIKU VS MOLYN INVESTMENTS LIMITED