Skip to content
JudgmentKrish Commodities Limited VS Anti Counterfeit Authority (ACA)1 min read

Krish Commodities Limited VS Anti Counterfeit Authority (ACA)

High Court at Mombasa High Court · · Jairus Ngaah

I have read the applicant's application dated 7 January 2026, which the applicant seeks to be admitted for hearing during this Honourable Court's Christmas recess. The basis for the urgency, as far as I understand the applicant, is that its goods, which have been seized by the respondent, are exposed to destruction owing to the manner in which they have been or are being handled by the respondent. I would suppose that the applicant may have a cause of action against the respondent if its goods are destroyed while in the custody of the respondent. Accordingly, I am not satisfied that the alleged danger to the safety of the applicant's goods is a sufficient reason either to certify the application urgent or to issue a mandatory injunction at this stage of the proceedings. I direct that the application be served for hearing after the court's recess. The respondent shall file and serve its response to the application within 14 days of the date of service of the application. The applicant's submissions on the application shall be filed and served within 14 days of the date of service of the respondent's response. Highlighting of submissions shall be on 24 March 2026. It is so ordered.
    Krish Commodities Limited VS Anti Counterfeit Authority (ACA) Krish Commodities Limited VS Anti Counterfeit Authority (ACA)