Skip to content
JudgmentMYERS LIMITED VS FANTASY HAVEN LIMITED1 min read

MYERS LIMITED VS FANTASY HAVEN LIMITED

High Court at Milimani High Court · · M.S.Shariff

RULING
1. The Appellant herein has approached this court vide a Chamber Summons dated 24Th August 2026 premised under the High Court Vacation Rules, supported by an affidavit of Enock Ongiti Esquire Advocate, wherein it craves for admissions of it's Notice of Motion dated 20.8.2026 for hearing during the High Court Recess.
2. In the substantive motion, the Appellant is craving for orders of stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 4.6.2026 in Milimani SCCCOMM/E52907/2026 following the delivery of the impugned ruling on6.8.2026.
3. Upon due consideration of this application, and the affidavit sworn in support thereof, I do find that the Appellant's Notice of Motion dated 20th August 2026 merits this court’s consideration during the High Court Recess and I therefore admit it as such for hearing.
IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED
Delivered, Signed and Dated at Milimani this 27th day of August 2026.
M. S. Shariff
Judge
    MYERS LIMITED VS FANTASY HAVEN LIMITED MYERS LIMITED VS FANTASY HAVEN LIMITED