Eugene Litiema Indako VS Securex Agencies (k) Limited
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtJudicial Review
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtPetitions
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtPetitions
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relations CourtAppeals
The Appellant appealed against the Chief Magistrate's Court judgment in ELRC No. 22 of 2019, which found his employment termination fair and awarded him leave allowance and one month's salary in lieu of notice. The Appellant claimed unlawful/unfair dismissal, alleging no hearing, no reason given, and harsh termination after two years of service. The trial court found termination fair, awarding Kshs. 17,617.60 for leave allowance and Kshs. 2,584 for one month's salary in lieu of notice. The Appellant argued the termination was unfair, the payment of Kshs. 10,000 was not consensual, and the court erred in law and fact on the date of employment and termination validity. The court upheld the trial court's decision, finding termination fair and awarding leave allowance and one month's salary in lieu of notice.