Search court decisions

…Mr Kimatta contended that the applicant was not guilty of unreasonable delay in bringing the application and has shown keen interest to have the matter in issue decided by this Court.…

…For an application for stay to succeed, the applicant has to satisfy the court that substantial loss may result unless the order is made and that the application has been made without unreasonable delay.…

…No order for stay of execution shall be made under sub-rule (1) unless- (a) the court is satisfied that substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made and that the application has been made without unreasonable…

…delay and (b) such security as the court orders for the due performance of such decree or order as may ultimately be binding on him has been given by the applicant.”…

…That the application has been made without unreasonable delay. (3). That the substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made. (4).…

…It is noted, also, that the Rules (Order XLIV R 1 (b) require application forReview to be made without unreasonable delay. Yet here, the judgment to bereviewed was delivered over 10 years ago.…

…That the application has been made without unreasonable delay. (3). That the substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made. (4).…

…That the application has been made without unreasonable delay. (3). That the substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made. (4).…

…That the application has been made without unreasonable delay. (3). That the substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made. (4).…

…That the application has been made without unreasonable delay. (3). That the substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made. (4).…

…It is noted, also, that the Rules (Order XLIV R 1 (b) require application forReview to be made without unreasonable delay. Yet here, the judgment to bereviewed was delivered over 10 years ago.…

…under section 33 of the Evidence Act because it was not established that the maker of the report was dead, or could not be found or had become incapable of giving evidence or his attendance could not be procured without an unreasonable…

…delay or expense nor was it established that it was made in the ordinary course of business in the discharge of professional duty.…

…Respondents filed grounds of opposition dated 23rd July, 2007 in which six grounds are raised in the following terms. 1) The application is incompetent and does not lie. 2) The application has been brought after an inordinate and unreasonable…

…delay. 3) The application is without merit, and is calculated to dealy the expeditious determination of this matter, which delay shall prejudice the Defendants greatly. 4) The Plaintiffs would not suffer any prejudice if…

…Respondents filed grounds of opposition dated 23rd July, 2007 in which six grounds are raised in the following terms. 1) The application is incompetent and does not lie. 2) The application has been brought after an inordinate and unreasonable…

…delay. 3) The application is without merit, and is calculated to dealy the expeditious determination of this matter, which delay shall prejudice the Defendants greatly. 4) The Plaintiffs would not suffer any prejudice if…

…reasons being shown, but the Court must under 0.41r.4 of the Civil Procedure Rules be satisfied (a) thatsubstantial loss may result to the applicant unless the orderis made; (b) That the application has been madewithout unreasonable…

…delay, and (c) Security has been given by the applicantfor the due performance of such decree ororder as may be ultimately binding upon him-.…