“"unreasonable delay"” — court decisions

Judgment[2020] KEELC 20321 December 2020

Mohamed Sharif Iderus v Mohamed Ali Hussein

Environment and Land Court at ChukaLucy Mbugua MeruCase E005 of 2020

Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case

…That the application has been made without unreasonable delay. (3). That the substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made. (4).…

application is grantedAllowed6 min read

Judgment[2000] KEHC 6519 November 2000

FRANCIS ORIGO & ANOTHER v JACOB KUMALI MUNGALA

High Court at EldoretMachio,MomanyiCivil Appeal 10 of 1980

Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal

…It is noted, also, that the Rules (Order XLIV R 1 (b) require application forReview to be made without unreasonable delay. Yet here, the judgment to bereviewed was delivered over 10 years ago.…

appeal is allowedAllowed6 min read

Judgment[2020] KEELC 18221 December 2020

Duba Ware v Hellen Hakule Halakhe

Environment and Land Court at ChukaLucy MbuguaCase E011 of 2020

Division and case type: Environment and LandCase

…That the application has been made without unreasonable delay. (3). That the substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made. (4).…

6 min read

Judgment[2020] KEHC 60621 December 2020

Atlantis Kenya Limited v Chebuswa Limited

High Court at MalindiCase number Miscellaneous Civil Application E13 of 2020

Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Civil Application

…That the application has been made without unreasonable delay. (3). That the substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made. (4).…

6 min read

Judgment[2000] KEHC 6111 September 2000

FRANCIS ORIGO & ANOTHER v JACOB KUMALI MUNGALA

High Court at EldoretJudge Eldoret,Nambuye,Judge hear Review,Judge Commissioner Assize,Machio Mr,Momanyi,Machio,Machio two JudgesCase number Civil Case 10 of 1980

Division and case type: CivilCivil Case

…It is noted, also, that the Rules (Order XLIV R 1 (b) require application forReview to be made without unreasonable delay. Yet here, the judgment to bereviewed was delivered over 10 years ago.…

Judgment[2007] KEHC 133229 November 2007

ATUL SHAH & ANOTHER v BHARAT DOSHI & ANOTHER

High Court at DoshiKasango,Kopere,Nyaoga,SaendeCase number Civil Case 294 of 2006

Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case

…Respondents filed grounds of opposition dated 23rd July, 2007 in which six grounds are raised in the following terms. 1) The application is incompetent and does not lie. 2) The application has been brought after an inordinate and unreasonable…

…delay. 3) The application is without merit, and is calculated to dealy the expeditious determination of this matter, which delay shall prejudice the Defendants greatly. 4) The Plaintiffs would not suffer any prejudice if…

Judgment[2006] KEHC 8829 November 2006

ATUL SHAH & another v BHARAT DOSHI & another

High Court at DoshiKasango,Kopere,Nyaoga,SaendeCase number Civil Case 294 of 2006

Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case

…Respondents filed grounds of opposition dated 23rd July, 2007 in which six grounds are raised in the following terms. 1) The application is incompetent and does not lie. 2) The application has been brought after an inordinate and unreasonable…

…delay. 3) The application is without merit, and is calculated to dealy the expeditious determination of this matter, which delay shall prejudice the Defendants greatly. 4) The Plaintiffs would not suffer any prejudice if…