Search court decisions

…The Tort of malicious or negligent abuse of power is as one writer puts it still A nascent tort. Each Tort is different and since the matter is one of policy, each can be decided in a different way from the next one.…

…The Tort of malicious or negligent abuse of power is as one writer puts it still A nascent tort. Each Tort is different and since the matter is one of policy, each can be decided in a different way from the next one.…

…Two matters must be established before the tort of malicious prosecution can be sustained.…

…In the above circumstances I am not satisfied that the tort of malicious prosecution has been proved.…

…First that the owners drivercommitted a tort, in the present case, a tort of negligence. Secondly, he mustprove that the driver was owners servant or agent.…

…The suit is based in tort for demolition and damages caused which I find in evidence and the admission contained in the memo and other correspondence put in as exhibits that both defendants are liable.…

…It is a decision therefore, which must command the highest respect in any country which has adopted the English Law of Tort.” Summarising the effect of Rookes V Barnard Spray VP stated at P 94.…

…On January 8, 1976, fourteen days before the expiration of the statutory period within which to bring an action for tort, a plaint was filed on her behalf claiming damages from the owner of the bus and also from J H Minet…

…As more than three years had lapsed since the accident she was entitled to avail of section 4 (2) of the Limitation of Actions Act (cap 22): “An action founded on tort may not be brought after the end of three years from…

…purported to deny that the defendant was criminally responsible for the plaintiff being maimed, but I take it that such denial is intended to and does not include any civil liability,” an assault being a crime as well as a tort…

…If it is unintentional it may yet be negligent (as distinct from the tort of negligence) or it may be pure accident or misadventure.…

…For these torts he claimed both special and general damages. In paragraph 3 of the defence the first defendant admitted that the second defendant was the agent of the first defendant but denied the alleged torts.…

…Indeed, no tort is alleged that has not been alleged in paragraph 6 of the plaint, and the attempt to present a claim for wrongful arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution as also a claim for defamation must be…

…It is accepted that in an action for malicious prosecution the plaintiff cannot succeed unless he establishes the following essential ingredients of the tort known as malicious prosecution.…

…(see Salmond on the Law of Torts 16th Edition, page 423) The plaintiff gave evidence on his own behalf and did not call any other witness.…

…It is neither contract nor Tort. It is in actual fact simply a claim under the provisions of the constitution. It cannot be categorized with those wrongs and claims limited under Cap 22.…

…Kisumu County Council 1971 E.A. where it was held that the law concerning exemplary damages in tort is authoritatively set out in Rookes vs. Bernard. The effect of Rookes vs.…

…Bernard is that the exemplary damages for tort may only be awarded in two classes of cases:- 1.…

…He further submitted that there was no wrongdoing, contractually or in tort, against the 3rd Defendant for which the remedy sought has been prayed for.…