Search court decisions

…would not suffer any prejudice if the suit proceeds. 5) It is in the interests of fairness and Justice that this application be dismissed and that the Defendnats be at liberty to prosecute their application to have the suit struck…

…out. 6) The Applicants do not have an arguable appeal.…

…The application canvassed before the learned single judge had been necessitated by the fact that the applicant’s appeal had been struck out by this Court on 21st February, 2001 on the ground that it was lodged one day out…

…Nakuru Civil Appeal No 156 of 1999 was struck out on 21st February, 2001 for being out of time. The applicant lodged this application a week later on 28th February, 2001.…

…The appeal is ordered to be struck out as incompetent, with costs to the respondent. Order accordingly. Dated at Nakuru this 5th day of October, 1983. C B MADAN ………………. JUDGE OF APPEAL A A KNELLER ………………..…

…On the 27th February, 1990, the appellant filed a chamber summons under order VI rule 13(1)(a) of the Civil Procedure Rules praying for an order that: “The respondent/plaintiff’s suit be struck out as it discloses no reasonable…

…In those circumstances, the judge ought to have allowed the appellant’s chamber summons and struck out the plaint as disclosing no cause of action.…

…The plaintiff/applicant has filed chamber summons under order VI rule 13(b) and c and order IXA rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking orders that the defence filed herein be struck out as the same is scandalous, frivolous…

…It is struck out with no orders as to costs. Orders accordingly. Dated and delivered at Nakuru this 28th day of August 1995 D.M RIMITA JUDGE…

…Trigeli Ltd (trading as Southern Window and General Clearing Co and Another 3 AER 671 where the District Registrar made a consent order that the defence of both defendants should be struck out unless the interrogations were…