Search court decisions

…With respect, there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellants in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…With respect, there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellants in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…With respect there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellants in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…There is however no mention of the period spent in custody being included in the sentence. 11.…

…The learned Judges went on to state: “Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…the period already spent in custody.…

…Courts are therefore expected to take into account the period that a person convicted of an offence spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…the period already spent in custody.…

…SPENT 2. THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to review the sentence meted of 10 years by taking into account the time spent in remand custody from the day of my arrest on 31st August, 2021. 3.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…the period already spent in custody.…

…At the hearing the applicant urged the court to consider time spent in custody. The Respondent through Mr.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…With respect, there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellants in custody. Taking into account” the period already spent by the appellants in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…already spent in custody.…

…With respect there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellants in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…The charge sheet show that the appellant was arrested on 25 th October 2021 and spent in custody till 1 st July, 2022. 7.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…the period already spent in custody.…

…The sentence was deemed to start from the date of conviction where time spent in custody was not considered under Section 33.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…