Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
….…………………………………………………….DEFENDANTS R U L I N G This is an application brought by the defendants under Order 9B Rule 8, Order 21 Rules 22, 25 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…It was expressed to be brought under O IXB rule 8 Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of Civil Procedure Act. Two orders were prayed for.…
…reconsidered the matter upon receipt of the grounds of opposition, because on the date of hearing he applied for leave to abandon one of the provisions under which the application was expressed be brought, and that was O IXB rule…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…Seventeen days after the judgment, however, Mr Macharia filed a summons in chambers expressed to be under Order IX B rule 8 Civil Procedure Rules asking for the judgment and order of June 11, 1979 to be set aside.…
…Order IXB rule 8 on August 2, 1979, which is the date when the application to set aside the judgment was filed, was this – “8.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
….…………..RESPONDENTS RULING This application is brought by Chamber Summons under Order IXB rule 8 and O XXI rule 22 Civil Procedure Rules. The applicants are the defendants in the suit.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…The plaintiff/applicant has filed chamber summons under order VI rule 13(b) and c and order IXA rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking orders that the defence filed herein be struck out as the same is scandalous, frivolous…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…before us, in limine, and having heard counsel’s arguments and submissions we upheld the learned trial Judge dismissed the objection to the appellant’s right to challenge the court’s jurisdiction and held that under Order 12 Rule…
…8 of the RSC of England, which apply, such appearance was proper and did not amount to the appellant submitting to the court’s jurisdiction nor preclude it from challenging the courts’ admiralty jurisdiction. 58.…