Search court decisions

…The documents filed on behalf of the petitioner in response to the application have not shown any admission of liability on behalf of the company. Invoices alone do not prove any indebtedness.…

…In response to that argument the applicants advocate relied on the case of MUKISA BISCUIT MANUFACTURING CO.…

…The respondent filed a Replying Affidavit on 26th August, 2011 in response to the applicant’s application.…

…Kioga in his response in court argued that the applicant’s application is misconceived. That both applicant and respondent are Joint Administrators and as such are equal in power in the administration of the estate.…

…According to KUBE's proposed constitution and rules, its membership was open to all unionisable employees engaged in the Banking Industry provided that such employees were above the apparent age of 16 years.In response tot…

…In response to the respondent's invitation for comments, KUBE wrote two letters addressed to respondent and dated 17th January, 1983.…

…The response of counsel for the respondent is that the applicant was the author of the delay in serving the Notice of Appeal in question.…

…This was followed up by several reminders, copies of which are exhibited to the affidavit of Mr Githuka (who now represents the respondent) filed in response to the application to strike out.…

…This was followed up by several reminders, copies of which are exhibited to the affidavit of Mr Githuka (who now represents the respondent) filed in response to the application to strike out.…

…The response of Mr. Opiyo for the respondent was that the single judge of this Court found no basis upon which to exercise his discretion in favour of the applicant.…

…Mr Lakha addressed us on three points in response to Mr Khaminwa’s submissions: 1. There was no evidence of service of the order 2.…

…In response to a clarification sought by the Court Mr Nowrojee informed us that Amin, J had on 13th April, 1993, granted an order for status quo to be maintained.…

…As it turned out, at the expiry of fourteen (14) days, no response to this letter had been received by the respondent.…

…There was no response to this letter. Meanwhile, the respondent instructed Messrs Ameka & Company Advocates to act on his behalf in place of Messrs Wanjira & Company, Advocates.…

…The defendant’s response to the plaintiff’s application is that under the Hire Purchase Agreements, it is the owner of the motor vehicles and under paragraph 4 thereof is entitled to repossess without previous notice or demand…

…The response of the respondents to the applicant’s affidavit and summons are not before me. So on this objection what is favorable to the respondents seems to be the sameness of the land and applicant.…

…Looking at the Defendant’s response to this allegation, the defendant merely states in paragraph 6 of the Replying Affidavit sworn by Joan Ombudu and filed on 25th July 2012 that the plaintiff was a bank manager who drafted…

…To this response, the plaintiff has made a further reply at paragraph 3(vi) to 3(xii).…

…The response of Mr. Opiyo for the respondent was that the single judge of this Court found no basis upon which to exercise his discretion in favour of the applicant.…

…The Applicant has filed a supplementary affidavit in response to the replying affidavit. The affidavit is sworn by the Defendant’s Advocate, JAMAL, dated 25th September, 2008. I have considered its contents.…

…That had formed the factual basis for the comment made by the respondent during the meeting which was called in response to complaints regarding the loss of this money.…

…Hira’s response, however, was that despite the respondent having had a right to appeal against the judgment of the superior court dated 20th May, 1998 and against the refusal by that court to set it aside, the respondent…

…Before I come to the petitioner’s response to this letter I must point out some aspects of the petition that have perturbed my mind. The petition, it is clear from the record, came like a bolt from the blue.…

…In the second paragraph of the said response the petitioners say that on account of the existence of complicated issues of mixed fact and law the issue was not one simply of valuation of shares.…

…him, the application and the suit were motivated by malice, vengeance and mischief and were calculated to oppress and unjustly hamper the 1st Defendant’s business and hinder their freedom to contract with each other in response…