Judgment[2011] KEHC 486
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
…The respondent filed a Replying Affidavit on 26th August, 2011 in response to the applicant’s application.…
…Kioga in his response in court argued that the applicant’s application is misconceived. That both applicant and respondent are Joint Administrators and as such are equal in power in the administration of the estate.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…Though served there has been no response by any of the plaintiffs. The application dated 30/5/2012 raises a serious issue on Mr. Njiru's standing as an advocate at the time he filed the application dated 16/5/2012.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…The response of the respondents to the applicant’s affidavit and summons are not before me. So on this objection what is favorable to the respondents seems to be the sameness of the land and applicant.…
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
…In his Response, Mr Prasad informed the court from the bar that his instructions were that the District Commissioner, Embu, who is the Chairman of the Mayatta Division Land Control Board, had other official duties to perform…