Search court decisions

…APPELLANT AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ....................................…

…After reviewing the prosecution evidence, the trial court put the appellant on his defence.…

…Further the amount of money stolen did not belong to the Government of Kenya and as such the prosecution in the lower courts has failed to establish this fact.…

…The prosecution required to prove that the appellant was the one who played a part in dealing with certain documents to prove that he stole.…

…Ogada is that the evidence of the prosecution witness was contradictory.…

…He submitted that the alleged contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses were minor and did not affect the conviction.…

…is founded upon the Constitution and a challenge to this authority must be direct and can only be dealt with in the High Court. (8) The conduct of criminal prosecutions is always a matter of public interest; therefore the…

…The above holding may be the correct exposition of the law but again that court decided as follows:- “Suppose the Attorney General, while conducting a prosecution that to all right-thinking people ought to be pursed, abruptly…

…It is only where the accused challenges such reports during his trial that the prosecution would and should seek leave to call the maker thereof in order that he may be subjected to crossexamination.…

…The charge as laid down was what the prosecution were called to prove. The trial magistrate found that the 2nd accused had no mens rea and acquitted him.…

…officers found 15 rounds each, that his defence was rejected without sufficient or reasonable grounds, that the learned magistrate unjustifiably disallowed the evidence of his co-accused, which exonerated him, that the prosecution…

…In any event, the appellant was not charged with these suspects nor did circumstances require prosecution to call the suspects who may not have been charged with any offence unless there was a possibility raised that the…

…It may also be observed that for a conviction to be had in offences involving sexual transgressions, the need for corroboraiton of the evidence of prosecution is essential.…

…During the course of the trial, the prosecution sought to adduce the cautionary statement of the appellant in evidence.…

…The quotation above relates to the U.K. whose Act of 1956, if it still operates, is longer and wider on subjects but apparently excluding criminal prosecutions.…

…It was incumbent on the prosecution to prove that such rights actually existed.…

…She however found that the prosecution had not proved this and it cannot be said that the accused persons were armed with a dangerous weapon.…

…The Magistrate erred and misdirected herself in both law and fact by failing to recognize the absence of an investigating officer in this case and the fact that in the absence of such an officer was fatal to the prosecution…

…He then appealed to the High Court against both the convictions and sentences and among his grounds of appeal were some challenging his identification by the prosecution witnesses who alleged they saw him among the robbers…

…He then appealed to the High Court against both the convictions and sentences and among his grounds of appeal were some challenging his identification by the prosecution witnesses who alleged they saw him among the robbers…

…The prosecution called eight (8) witnesses.…

…The application was not opposed by the prosecution.…

…It could have been due to poor prosecution but the learned trial magistrate should not have allowed that to happen. A.P.C. Alex Gichege was recorded as P.W.3 when he should have been P.W.4.…

…Firstly, the prosecution was poor and the evidence badly recorded. Secondly, the statement under inquiry was inadmissible and if admissible, it was improperly admitted in the evidence.…

…The learned trial magistrate gave the summary of the evidence for the prosecution and the appellant and then stated that the appellant had been properly identified and convicted him.…

…Regarding the appellant's alibi defence, he said the same was displaced by the prosecution evidence. He dismissed as unfounded Mr.…

…The prosecution is therefore relying on circumstantial evidence that if the children saw the appellant mix something in a cup, she must be the one who laced the tea with poison. That evidence, however, does not add up.…

…In this appeal he complains that his case was not investigated and was given no opportunity to question the prosecution witnesses and in effect he denies the charge against him.…

…He confirmed his plea by accepting as true the facts narrated by the prosecution.…

…If the prosecution evidence is accepted then after the arrival of Wanjuki the events that happened constituted corruption.…

…It was the option of the prosecution with which offence to charge the appellant.…