Search court decisions

…That the prosecution failed to produce exhibits that could give clear proof of the commission of the said oence and that the appellant was linked to the same. iv.…

…Shabola submitted that the evidence produced by the prosecution although circumstantial, did place the appellant at the scene of crime. Mr.…

…The prosecution claimed that they had robbed one John Bwana Opundo of cash Kshs 6000. According to the prosecution, the complainant arrived from Bondo with a view to do some shopping in Kisumu. He has a shop there.…

…He held that the prosecution’s version of the matter was the side of truth and that the appellant and his confederates indeed robbed the complainant of his money.…

…There are, however, other aspects of the case for the prosecution which we must consider.…

…Inspector David Wangombe who investigated the murder also gave evidence for the prosecution which has some unusual features.…

…Criminal Law – false pretence – charge of procuring registration of land by false pretences - Penal Code (cap 63) section 320 - whether prosecution for the offence can be brought after lapse of a long time – section 219 Criminal…

…The appellant’s main ground of appeal was that neither the trial magistrate nor the learned first appellate judge gave any or adequate consideration to the discrepancies and conflicts in the evidence of the several prosecution…

…The learned Judge sat with three assessors and he heard all the eleven witnesses called by the prosecution in support of its case. After listening to the submissions of the appellant’s then advocate Mr.…

…No summing-up notes were available on the record and the incoming Judge deprived the appellant and of course himself of the opinion of the two assessors who had at least seen and heard the prosecution witnesses and the appellant…

…That would lend weight to the prosecution’s contention that the applicant is likely to interfere with the investigations.…

…I refuse this application and order it dismissed and if Mr Aluoch for the applicant is so inclined, he and the prosecution can have the case mentioned before the trial magistrate with a view to getting earlier hearing dates…

…B.Ombewa) found that the prosecution had provided its case with sufficient and reliable evidence to convict the appellant with the offence of defilement.…

…which evidence did not prove the prosecution’s case beyond reasonable grounds; and in upholding a sentence which was excessive.…

…The trial magistrate after outlining the evidence of the prosecution witness as stated that he believed their evidence but gave no reason for believing it apart from saying that they had nor reason for lying.…

…It was after the trial magistrate had considered and decided on the prosecution evidence, that he rejected the defences as false, again without giving any reasons.…

…It was the prosecution case that at the material time being 1 pm of 12th December, 1989 PW 1 who was the herdsboy for all the animals charged as robbed from him, took the herd and flock of sheep to water.…

…In the ultimate this Court is left in enormous doubt as to the quality of the prosecution evidence against the appellant.…

…The prosecution case was dependent on the evidence of PW1.…

…In the result, I am persuaded that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt that the accused beat the deceased for 20 minutes.…

…iii) of the Act provides as follows: “185(d)(iii) Any person who acquires, has in his possession, …, any goods which he knows, or ought reasonably to have known to be uncustomed goods, shall be guilty of an offence …” The prosecution…

…The two lower courts found that the appellant was in possession of the goods on his own admission, and the prosecution proved that the goods in question were dutiable.…

…The trial magistrate after outlining the evidence of the prosecution witness as stated that he believed their evidence but gave no reason for believing it apart from saying that they had nor reason for lying.…

…It was after the trial magistrate had considered and decided on the prosecution evidence, that he rejected the defences as false, again without giving any reasons.…

…Briefly the evidence for the prosecution was that on 30.4.1994 at about 8 am the complainant Silvanus Odhiambo Odongo (PW1) was sitting outside his house at Kodera Kwoyo in Rongo division when the two appellants who were…

…On my own consideration and evaluation of the matter I find that the evidence in support of the prosecution case was overwhelming and that each of the appellants was properly convicted.…

…This point, however has not been taken in the appellant’s memorandum of appeal, neither, in our view, could it be, as it did not form part of the prosecution case but was volunteered from the dock by the appellant.…

…He also submitted that the prosecution evidence as to where the children’s shoes, Exhibit 77, were found was contradictory.…

…He confirmed his plea by accepting as true the facts narrated by the prosecution.…

…The evidence for the prosecution was that some 50 Kuria civilians, which included the second and the third accused (1st & 2nd appellants) went to the home of the Masai complainant (PW1) looking for some stolen head of cattle…

…On the evidence for the prosecution it was not established as to who actually drove the cattle to the home Elizabeth.…

…Some prosecution witnesses said that the period taken was from about midnight to 6.00 am or 5.00 am and that the beating was interrupted with periods of interrogation.…

…At the same time that statement can be said to be corroborated by the evidence of prosecution eye witnesses. That situation is not covered in the Rex v Ndaria case.…

…The respondent should not be penalized for the appellant’s tardiness when it had in fact applied to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution at one stage.…

…That being the case, in the present case, on the basis of Section 28(b) of the Evidence Act, the material statements ought to have been excluded in the consideration whether or not the prosecution had proved the case against…