Search court decisions

…It was the prosecution case that at the material time being 1 pm of 12th December, 1989 PW 1 who was the herdsboy for all the animals charged as robbed from him, took the herd and flock of sheep to water.…

…In the ultimate this Court is left in enormous doubt as to the quality of the prosecution evidence against the appellant.…

…It is only where the accused challenges such reports during his trial that the prosecution would and should seek leave to call the maker thereof in order that he may be subjected to crossexamination.…

…The charge as laid down was what the prosecution were called to prove. The trial magistrate found that the 2nd accused had no mens rea and acquitted him.…

…The prosecution case was dependent on the evidence of PW1.…

…In the result, I am persuaded that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt that the accused beat the deceased for 20 minutes.…

…It may also be observed that for a conviction to be had in offences involving sexual transgressions, the need for corroboraiton of the evidence of prosecution is essential.…

…During the course of the trial, the prosecution sought to adduce the cautionary statement of the appellant in evidence.…

…Briefly the evidence for the prosecution was that on 30.4.1994 at about 8 am the complainant Silvanus Odhiambo Odongo (PW1) was sitting outside his house at Kodera Kwoyo in Rongo division when the two appellants who were…

…On my own consideration and evaluation of the matter I find that the evidence in support of the prosecution case was overwhelming and that each of the appellants was properly convicted.…

…It could have been due to poor prosecution but the learned trial magistrate should not have allowed that to happen. A.P.C. Alex Gichege was recorded as P.W.3 when he should have been P.W.4.…

…Firstly, the prosecution was poor and the evidence badly recorded. Secondly, the statement under inquiry was inadmissible and if admissible, it was improperly admitted in the evidence.…

…The learned trial magistrate gave the summary of the evidence for the prosecution and the appellant and then stated that the appellant had been properly identified and convicted him.…

…The evidence for the prosecution was that some 50 Kuria civilians, which included the second and the third accused (1st & 2nd appellants) went to the home of the Masai complainant (PW1) looking for some stolen head of cattle…

…On the evidence for the prosecution it was not established as to who actually drove the cattle to the home Elizabeth.…

…The case for the prosecution was, in outline, as follows. The complainant, the appellant, his co-accused and other patrons were at Heshima Bar taking beer at the back room.…

…The respondent should not be penalized for the appellant’s tardiness when it had in fact applied to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution at one stage.…

…who appeared for both appellants directed our attention to three matters: 1. whether the evidence of identification of the appellants was free from the possibility of error; 2. whether the discrepancies in the evidence of prosecution…

…It is possible that, since an assault was express mention of criminal responsibility in the pleadings, that the learned judge thought the case should be treated in the same way as a criminal prosecution.…