Search court decisions

…That the learned trial magistrate erred in law and fact by misapplying the law on privity of contract. 5.…

…law on privity of contract.…

…The Court failed to appreciate the principle of privity of contract, which prevents the enforcement of obligations against a non-party. c.…

…It is its case that here is no privity of contract between the 1st Respondent and the 2nd Respondent”. 17.…

…She submitted that the matter in issue falls within the exceptions to the doctrine of privity of contract, particularly on agency. 11. Mr.…

…doctrine of privity of contract postulates that a contract cannot confer rights or impose obligations on any person other than the parties to the contract.…

…of contract between the parties hereto.”…

…The right of subrogation in a contract of insurance cannot create privity of contract between the insurance company and third parties.…

…That finding was however not correct in so far as the learned trial magistrate did not consider the various exceptions to the principle of privity of contract.…

…[citing Judicial Studies Institute Journal: ClionaKelly, Privity of Contract-The Benefits of Reform [2008]].…

…Concerning the second issue, it was argued that the doctrine of privity of contract holds that a contract cannot confer rights or impose obligations on anyone other than the parties involved.…

…It was further argued that, lacking privity of contract, the 1st Respondent cannot claim to sue on the insurance policy.…

…The Appellants contended that there was no privity of contract between the Appellants and the 1st Respondent. The matter was disposed by way of documents.…

…The Court of Appeal, in William Muthee Muthoni v Bank of Baroda [2014] eKLR stated that once it is demonstrated that there exists an agency relationship, then the doctrine of privity of contract and the general rule that…

…The 8th defendant seeks to be discharged and struck out from the proceedings primarily on the grounds of lack of privity of contract and improper joinder. 2.…

…The 8th defendant seeks to be discharged and struck out from the proceedings primarily on the grounds of lack of privity of contract and improper joinder.…

…The respondent further submitted that the doctrine of privity of contract did not operate as an exclusionary rule of evidence and so does not preclude a third party from relying on a contract as documentary evidence of a…

…As I deal with the main issue regarding the nature of separation of the appellant and his former employer, the court will also determine whether the doctrine of privity of contract barred the respondent from relying on the…

…privity of contract. 9.…

…Counsel pointed out that the Fee Agreement dated 28th January, 2020, and referenced to in Paragraphs 12 and 13 of the Plaintiff/Respondent’s Replying Affidavit is premised on privity of contract. In Counsel’s view, Ms.…

…Against the aforesaid background, the Appellant has submitted at length on the doctrine and privity of contract and its application to the circumstances of this case.…

…In light of the general understanding of the doctrine of privity of contract, I would agree with the Board that since it was not a party to the contract then the contract cannot be enforced against it.…

…There is no privity of contract shown from the plaint dated 8.12.2021.…

…There is therefore no privity of contract between the 2nd Defendant and the Plaintiff. …

…In other words, the appellant argues that there was no privity of contract between her and the respondent.…

…It is obvious to me that the issue of whether there was privity of contract between the parties is a matter of law.…

…There is no privity of contract between the Applicant and the 1st Respondent herein. iv. The claim (if any) is barred by the statute of limitations. v.…

…He further argued that there exists no privity of contract between the Applicant and the 1st Respondent, Stanbic Holdings PLC, and that the application was lodged by an incompetent person without capacity. 5.…

…She submitted that the contract of insurance in this case was between the respondent and the registered owners of the suit vehicle and thus the issue of privity of contract did not arise in this case. 10.…

…The doctrine of Privity of Contract is a long established part of the law of contract. It is one of the fundamental principles of the English Contract law.…

…In Savings & Loan (K) Limited v Kanyenje Karangaita Gakombe & Another (2015) eKLR, while considering ‘privity of contract’, the court rendered itself thus: - “In its classical rendering, the doctrine of privity of contract…

…In our considered view, the doctrine of privity of contract cannot be used to oust responsibility to a third-party beneficiary of a performance bond.…

…Defendant (Insurer) – there is no privity of contract: the Plaintiffs are purporting to enforce a contract to which the 2nd and 3rd Defendants are not parties: furthermore, the Plaintiffs are not shareholders in the 1st…

…Fourth, they argue that prayers 5 to 8 offend the doctrine of privity of contract, as the 2nd and 3rd Defendants (shareholders of the 1st Defendant) are not parties to the insurance contracts between the Plaintiffs and the…

…This is the doctrine of privity of contract. The appellant countered asserting it has a right to sue the respondent Bank as the third party beneficiary to the bond.…

…The trial judge in dismissing the defence of privity of contract cited the case of Gakombe vs.…

…The trial Magistrate erred in law and in fact by misapplying the principle of privity of contract vis-àvis the prevailing evidence and circumstances of the case as normally applied in the sugarcane industry. 8) Based on those…

…privity of contract by treating it as an absolute bar to liability on the part of the 2 nd Respondent.…