Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…In Henderson v Henry E Jenkins & Sons [1970] AC 282 at 301 Lord Pearson at letter D stated: “In an action for negligence the plaintiff must allege, and has the burden of proving, that the accident was caused by negligence…
…What sort of negligence could there be in overtaking? There is no evidence to support contributory negligence either.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…These follow the usual, stereotyped, particulars of negligence which can be obtained from any book on pleadings and civil procedure.…
…He is entitled, and indeed bound, if he is not to be guilty of any contributory negligence, to take reasonable precautions to avoid injury to himself. In Jones v Boyce [1816] 171 ER VOL.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…In the final analysis I hold the plaintiff’s injuries resulted from the negligence of the contractors (or the plaintiff’s employers) who were responsible for the excavation of the pit.…
…The Plaintiff’s negligence? I have to direct myself as to possible contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…In the threeparagraph defence, the Defendant denied any negligence as alleged in the plaint and put the Plaintiff to the strick proof of her allegations.…
…Paragraph 4 alleges negligence on the part of the Defendant’s servant/agent and sets out the particulars of the alleged negligence.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…Mr Aboo’s further submission was that the respondent’s cause of action was for damages for negligence or breach of duty (the duty existing by virtue of a contract) and the damages he claimed for the negligence and or breach…
…or any such provision) where the damages by the plaintiff for the negligence, nuisance or breach of duty consist of or include damages in respect of personal injuries to any person.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…At the hearing of the suit the Plaintiff’s witnesses adduced evidence to the effect that c. the accident was due to the negligence of the 1st defendant who was the 2nd defendant’s servant. They were duly cross-examined.…
…The burden of proving that there was no negligence on the part of the driver was clearly his.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
……………DEFENDANT JUDGMENT The plaintiff filed this suit on 25/10/83 to recover damages for injuries she sustained in a road accident allegedly due to the defendant’s negligence.…
…Those circumstances give rise to the inference of negligence.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…He expressly found that the respondent was not guilty of any contributory negligence.…
…He thus answered in specle the only allegation of negligence which were really particular to this case, as opposed to the generalities to which I have just referred.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…Strangely enough, counsel for the respondent submitted that there was no negligence on the part of the Club.…
…The defendant’s failure to supply a helmet after evidence of the previous incident of attack is an act of continued negligence.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…The defendants filed a defence in which they denied the negligence allegedly attributed to lst defendant and the particulars of it given in the plaint.…
…In the alternative they averred that the said accident was solely caused or substantially contributed to by the negligence f the plaintiff’s servant and / or agent for which the plaintiff was vicariously liable.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…The plaintiff pleads that the accident was caused by negligence of the tractor driver, or matatu driver or the negligence of both drivers and has set out the acts of negligence of each of the two drivers in para 7 of the…
…The owner and driver of the matatu on the other hand, in their amended defence deny negligence and attribute the accident to the negligence of the owner and driver of the tractor.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…He brought this action against the Defendant claiming that the Defendant was negligent and that it was such negligence which occasioned the accident.…
…At first the Defendant denied liability for the negligence but on the 30th October, 1991, the parties agreed that the Plaintiff was himself 10% negligent while the Defendant was 90% negligent.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…There was negligence on the part of the defendants although there has been no evidence to enable me to pinpoint the exact stage at which that negligence occurred as between the time the letter was sent out by the High Court…
…During that period the plaintiff lost the freedom which he should not have lost had there not been the negligence of the defendants.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…Issue No.3: Was the break-in and theft caused due to breachof agreement and/or negligence on the part of the Defendant'ssecurity guards as alleged in paragraph 5 of the Plaint?…
…The issue of negligence ought to be proved and established.This was not. "This case has been very poorly made out."…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…The total award of Shs 168,770/= is then reduced to Shs 135,016/= on account of the plaintiff 20% contributory negligence.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…conflicting contentions of both sides, the learned judge delivered himself as follows: “Having already analysed the material events which culminated in the sale of the vehicle it is clear that the person who would be guilty of negligence…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…the contract between the plaintiff and first defendant, the latter finally claims that there was a condition exempting the defendant from liability for any loss or damage of any kind resulting wholly or partly from the negligence…
…the contract between the first defendant and second defendant was admitted with the object no doubt of showing that the second defendant was the agent or servant of the first defendant, the exemption clause covered any negligence…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…The defendants have accepted their full liability for the negligence which resulted in the collision and so this case comes to me solely for assessment of damages to be paid to the plaintiff as compensation for the injuries…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…The doctrine that if the plaintiff's act was the proximate cause of the damage the plaintiff can not recover is well established.Would this accident have not occured but for the negligence of the plaintiff?…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…In the defence statement the particulars of the defendant’s negligence as listed in the plaint are categorically denied.…