Search court decisions

…But as noted above the motion was withdrawn on 22.3.9 when a notice of motion by the 2nd respondent, also dated 17.2.93 came up for hearing.…

…The 2nd respondent’s motion was filed by Mr James Orengo, his advocate, who also swore an affidavit in support thereof.…

…The vendors commenced an action seeking inter alia an order vacating the caution, and on an interlocutory motion obtained an order vacating the caution.…

…He urged that the court could not, or at any rate should not use a motion so as summarily to vacate an entry before trial.…

…This is a ruling on an application for joinder by the proposed interested party filed by Notice of Motion dated 3rd October 2016. The application for joinder is not opposed by the respondents.…

…The application had been filed in the name of the Rangers Court Welfare Association by Notice of Motion dated 16th September 2016, but it was subsequently withdrawn and refiled as Notice of Motion dated 3rd October 2016 in…

….…...RESPONDENT RULING The Notice of Motion application which came for hearing was filed in court on 23rd March 1988. Exparte orders had been granted to the applicant on 7/3/88.…

….……..2ND DEFENDANT R U L I N G The 1st defendant has moved this court, by Notice of Motion dated 13th July 2005, brought under 0XXXIX Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act.…

…The defendant is granted costs of the Notice of Motion dated 13th July 2005. It is so ordered. Dated and delivered this 19th December 2005. MARY KASANGO JUDGE…

….…… DEFENDANT RULING The motion before the court is based upon the Affidavit of JAO Adera Chief Legal/corporation Secretary of the plaintiff Bank. The plaintiff prays for orders:- 1.…

………………RESPONDENT RULING Before me is a notice of motion filed pursuant to Section 18 (1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Act.…

…COMPANY LTD........................................PLAINTIFF versus NJILUX MOTORS LIMITED............................................................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G This is an application by Notice of Motion…

….………..RESPONDENTS RULING The Notice of Motion filed in civil appeal No 79 of 1979 (which application is dated 9th June 1987 and filed on 10th June 1987) was by consent of counsel heard together with a similar application…

…By notice of motion of the same date the appellant applied for leave to call additional evidence on the hearing of the appeal.…

…The Notice of Motion was supported by the affidavit of Kiraitu Murungi sworn on December 1, 1986.…

…The Court further heard that the petitioner then came to court and filed a notice of motion on 5.6.2003.…

…Further that the service of that notice of motion could thus be dispensed with but then the Court would give directions as to hearing inter partes.…

….…….4TH DEFENDANT RULING The first and second defendants have pending before court a Notice of Motion dated 27th July 2006 seeking the dismissal of this suit for want of prosecution.…

…For that reason at the reading of this ruling and to ensure that justice is met on behalf of the 1st and 2nd defendant the court will give a hearing date for the notice to motion dated 27th of July 2006.…

….…….DEFENDANT R U L I N G The Originating Notice of Motion dated 22.4.2003 is filed by a former military personnel who was Court martialed as a result of a failed military coup in Kenya in 1982.…

…He brings this Motion under Section 60, 70, 72 and 84 of the Constitution to challenge the constitutionality of the trial and the legality of his dismissal.…

…By a Notice of motion dated 21/11/2019, the plaintiff/applicant prayed that the statement of defence filed by the three defendants be struck out on account that it grounded on the allegations that the plaintiff was not a…

…The motion was supported by the Affidavit of the Applicant/plaintiff which essentially reiterated the grounds of the application by exhibiting the ruling Njoki J.…

…REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO. 450 OF 1988 L VADGAMA ……………………………..APPLICANT VERSUS ARYA SAMAJ………………………………DEFENDANT RULING The defendant Arya Samaj has moved this court by motion on…

…The application is one which was supposed to be brought by summons while the former was supposed to be by motion.…

….……………………………………..6TH DEFENDANT R U L I N G The application is a notice of motion dated 19th June, 2008. It is brought under Order L rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and section 3A of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…Order L Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules provides that any application to court may be filed by motion where the rules do not expressly provide for a different procedure.…

…Against the foregoing background information as gleaned from the pleadings of both parties, the Plaintiffs have filed an interim application by way of notice of motion dated 29th June 2007 and filed the same date.…

…They each rose through different ranks and as at the time events leading to this proceedings, were set in motion, each of them was holding a post of a managerial rank as outlined herein. (2) In the year 2002, the Defendant…

…DEFENDANT R U L I N G This is a Notice of Motion brought under Order XLIV Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules in which the applicant is seeking the following orders:- “1.…

…DEFENDANT R U L I N G This application is brought by way of a Notice of Motion dated 27th May, 2010, and taken out under Order VI Rule 13(1) (A) of the Civil Procedure Rules.By the application, the defendant moves the court…