We use strictly necessary cookies to run the site. With your consent we also use performance cookies to understand how the site is used. Read the cookie policy.
Case law
Search court decisions
47,624 judgments, rulings and orders · latest 21 September 2026
Search tips:"exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
High Court at NairobiCase number Miscellaneous Application E167 of 2025
Division and case type: Civil·Miscellaneous Application
…Adan v Business Premises Rent Tribunal; Njogu & another (Interested Parties) (Miscellaneous Application E167 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 19177 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (22 December 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 19177…
…(KLR)
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS)
JUDICIAL REVIEW
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E167 OF 2025
RE ABURILI, J
DECEMBER 22, 2025
IN THE MATTER OF:- AN APPLICATION BY HUSSEIN MOHAMED ADAN…
High Court at NairobiCase number Miscellaneous Application 361 of 1994
Division and case type: Civil·Miscellaneous Application
…REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO 361 OF 1994
SIMEL & OTHERS.........................................................................APPLICANTS
VERSUS
COUNTY COUNCIL OF NAROK…
Division and case type: Civil·Miscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 47 OF 2011 In the matter of the Estate of MZEE OMARI (Deceased) ABDALLA MUTEMBEI GISAGA.................................APPLICANT VERSUS PAMELA GACHERI PATRISIO.........................1ST RESPONDENT CRISUS MICHENI NDEKE (MWALIMU)..........2ND RESPONDENT NYAGA ISMAEL (SMATEX)............................3RD RESPONDENT JOSEPH MURITHI (MUEMBU).......................4TH RESPONDENT NJAGI NTIBA (CHIBU)...........................
High Court at NairobiEmukule,Ochieng OduolCase number Miscellaneous Application 21 of 2005
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial Courts·Miscellaneous Application
factors or to omit to consider relevant factors, and according to the Advocates Remuneration Order itself, some of the relevant factors to take into account include the nature and importance of the course or matter, the amount or value of the subject matter involved, the interest of the parties, the general conduct of the proceedings and any direction by the trial judge." In this case, the applicant has faulted the taxing officer for failing to take into account the sum which was awarded by t
Division and case type: Civil·Miscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL 36 OF 2008 ADBULHAKIM MOHAMED HASSAN HUSSEIN..............APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Ombija, J.) dated 26th March, 2008 in H.C.Cr. 196 of 2003) ***************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Abdulhakim Mohamed Hassan Hussein, the appellant herein was arraigned in the superior c
Division and case type: Civil·Miscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MISC. 298 OF 1986 REPUBLIC OF KENYA.........................................APPLICANT VERSUS THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS............................RESPONDENT EX-PARTE - KENYA UNION OF COMMERCIAL, FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS AND BANKING, INSURANCE AND FINANCE UNION (K) .....INTERESTED PARTY CORAM: GICHERU, J.
High Court at EmbuCase number Civil Miscellaneous Application 42 of 1999
Division and case type: Civil·Miscellaneous Application
decisions of the Board are to be recorded; Section 17 deals with the power of the Board to order attendance and Section 9 thereof gives the Board mandatory considerations for the granting or refusal of consent. A District Commissioner or designated person cannot purport to sit alone to approve an application for consent under the Act.
…The file was transferred to this court for hearing and when the case was given a new registration number it was booked as a Miscellaneous Application. This led to the subsequent pleadings being wrongly headed.…
High Court at NairobiBosireCase number Miscellaneous Criminal Application 34 of 1992
Division and case type: Criminal·Miscellaneous Criminal Application
…He referred the Court to Criminal Revision No 19 of 1991 and Miscellaneous Application Nos 569 of 1991 and 14 of 1992 (consolidated) filed by Mirugi Kariuki and Koigi wa Wamwere respectively, ruled upon by Porter and Bosire…
…See Anarita Karimi Njeru (supra) as quoted in Kennneth Njindo Stanley Matiba v The Attorney – General Miscellaneous Application No 666 of 1990 (unreported), reproduced from R v El Mann [1969] EA 351.…