Search court decisions

…The court found that the medical evidence proved penetration, and that the same was by the appellant.…

…The appellant alleges that the medical evidence was imsy, yet he has not demonstrated how that was so. Both PW1 and himself were examined by PW2, within hours of the occurrence of the events.…

…On counts three and four, there was no medical evidence nor any observation of what happened to each complainant by the other to afford corroboration.…

…They all also said that they and the deceased were not armed and, what borne out by the medical evidence, that the deceased was shot in the back of the head not only negating any presumption that he had been shot in self…

…With respect to the lack of ballistic evidence connecting the shot alleged to have been fired by the appellant which caused the death of the deceased, there is the uncontroverted medical evidence that the deceased died of…

…On counts three and four, there was no medical evidence nor any observation of what happened to each complainant by the other to afford corroboration.…

…Regarding the conclusion by the trial court that the complainant had some injury in her reproductive or urinary system, the learned Judge found that to be a factual conclusion by the trial court borne by medical evidence…

…That medical evidence talks of beating in general yet from the evidence the deceased was beaten several times.…

…The medical evidence did not establish which blow caused the fatal injury or that both blows were fatal.…