Search court decisions

…The court found that the medical evidence proved penetration, and that the same was by the appellant.…

…The appellant alleges that the medical evidence was imsy, yet he has not demonstrated how that was so. Both PW1 and himself were examined by PW2, within hours of the occurrence of the events.…

…In contradistinction with his oral testimony the medical evidence does not accord with it. There was no mention of any injury to his eye.…

…There are peculiar aspects about Dr Rouhani’s medical evidence.…

…His evidence is well corroborated by the testimony of his father and the medical evidence.…

…The appellant was represented in the lower court and made no effort to call medical evidence.…

…The medical evidence shows that the plaintiff’s complaints for which he is justified in seeking compensation are loss of the right leg and the consequential inability to work or use the leg.…