Search court decisions

…Terming the proposed interested parties necessary and proper parties to the appeal, the applicants contends that joinder of the proposed interested parties does not introduce new issues to the appeal as the issue of ownership…

…For this court to issue such orders against the proposed interested parties, there must be proper pleadings instituted against the proposed interested parties.…

…Terming the proposed interested parties necessary and proper parties to the appeal, the applicants contend that joinder of the proposed interested parties does not introduce new issues to the appeal as the issue of ownership…

…For this court to issue such orders against the proposed interested parties, there must be proper pleadings instituted against the proposed interested parties.…

…Parties/Applicant should be joined in the matter as Interested parties?…

…I)   Whether the Proposed Interested Parties/Applicants should be joined in the matter as Interested parties? 20.   …

…parties as interested parties in this case. c) That the costs of this Application be provided for. 2.…

…The Proposed Interested Parties filed a further affidavit dated 21st April, 2026, by the 1st proposed interested party, on behalf of the proposed Interested Parties, and stated that Nakuru West Jua Kali Association is a duly…

…The Intended Interested Parties’ case 3.…

…suit as interested parties.…

…The interested parties filed the notice of motion dated 5th March 2025 seeing for interalia that: a.…

…That the suit be dismissed with costs to interested parties.…

…The proposed interested parties moved the court through the notice of motion dated 24th February 2025, seeking for inter alia: a. To be joined in the suit as interested parties. b.…

…That the 1st Proposed Interested Party is a son of the late Francis Thiaka Njagi, while the 2nd Proposed Interested Party is his daughter-in-law, and that they lay claim to the portion said to have been associated with that…

…parties to be joined in the proceedings as an interested party and once leave is granted, to file pleadings, affidavits and such other necessary documents thereof in defence of their interest in this suit. c) Spent. d) THAT…

…The 1st proposed interested party in response filed a further affidavit sworn on 25th September, 2024.…

…Subsequently, the said Intended Interested Parties/Applicants filed Notice of Motion dated 16th February 2024, which is the subject of this ruling.…

…and that it is therefore not correct for the Interested Parties/Applicants to claim that the date of the ruling was not communicated to them.…

…The Interested Parties’ case The Interested Parties opposed the petition through a replying affidavit sworn by the 1st Interested Party on 12th April 2024.…

…blamed on the Interested Parties.…

…and that it is therefore not correct for the Interested Parties/Applicants to claim that the date of the ruling was not communicated to them.…

…The Interested Parties/Applicants filed submissions dated 23rd April 2024 while the Plaintiffs/Claimants filed submissions dated 12th June 2024.…

…of the Kishamba B Community (hereinafter “the Proposed Interested Parties’ application”).…

…Ng’ang’a, learned counsel for the Proposed Interested Parties, submitted that the Proposed Interested Parties have a direct stake in the matter and that, while they are not challenging the decree, the outcome of the pending…

…The first interested party says that he opposes the motion because there is a difference between the old and the new map. (5) The 2nd interested party says that the current boundaries have been in place from 1975 to date.…

…Delivered online in the presence of; - Court Assistants – Jackline and Antony Applicant’s Counsel – Mr T M Kariuki 1st Interested party – Present 2nd Interested party – Present 3rd Interested party – Absent 4th Interested…

…The 3rd -5th Intended Interested Parties moved the court vide a Notice of Motion dated 16/10/2024 seeking inter alia, orders that they be joined to this suit as interested parties and the necessary amendment be made to the…

…Intended Interested Parties’ Submissions Dated 17/2/2025 3. The intended interested parties’ submissions were brief.…

…It is well settled that an Interested Party may not frame its own issues or introduce new issues for determination by the court. The participation of an Interested Party in a suit is limited.…

…An interested party cannot even file pleadings in a suit. 8.…

…Intended interested parties’ application 3.…

…Whether the applicants have made out a case for their joinder as interested parties 11.…

…The Plaintiff averred that even if the Interested Parties had been joined to the suit as Interested Parties, they would have had no right to seek substantive orders.…

…As mentioned earlier, the application before the court has been brought by the Defendant and the Interested Parties. The Interested Parties were not parties to the suit when the impugned judgment was made.…

…Party VALENTINE OSAMAIT ACHETO – 6th Interested Party ANDREW OMADI OKWANG’ANEL – 7th Interested Party ABISANIO EPOKOR OKUTII – 8th Interested Party VINCENT PAKANDA ODIMA – 9th Interested Party OJUMA ENYOKOI NYAMORI – 10th…

…Interested Party ANITA ALUKUDO ETYANG – 11th Interested Party STEPHEN IMOKOLA – 12th Interested Party PATRICK IMWAN EKISA – 13th Interested Party REMUGIUS OCHEBO – 14th Interested Party HENDRIKA ETYANG EMURUDU – 15th Interested…

…In Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v Mumo Matemu & 5 others [2014] eKLR, the Supreme Court in defining an interested party stated thus; “…while an interested party has a ‘stake/interest’ directly in the case, an…

…The intended interested parties argue that the vesting order dated 9th March, 2018 was obtained irregularly.…