Search court decisions

…He was, however, concerned with whether or not the company should have the interlocutory injunction and he did not have to decide the issues in the suit.…

…The company’s next move was to ask for an interim injunction pending the determination of its appeal from his ruling but the learned judge declared he saw: “no grounds for granting an injunction that would manifestly result…

…In the case of Aghal A.I.R. 1926 sind 201, Labu A.C.J. held that the court has power to grant on interim mandatory injunction under order XXXIX, r 1 and 2, (India) but this power it to be used sparingly and each case should…

…He seeks mandatory injunction against the respondents. As I have said the respondents have not committed any wrong against the applicant. They have not taken away his rights unlawfully.…

…The Plaintiff’s claim against the defendants is for an order of injunction to restrain the 1st to 10th defendants from assuming office as representatives of the said group ranch.…

…It is the suit filed by Shem Nyambasi Mulefu and Elija Nandi Chikamai against the applicant for injunction, eviction and general damages.…

…Although the respondents got themselves registered as proprietors of the applicant’s parcel of land and got certificate of title, the suit filed for injunction as to trespass, possession and damages relates to a different…

…It is the suit filed by Shem Nyambasi Mulefu and Elija Nandi Chikamai against the applicant for injunction, eviction and general damages.…

…Although the respondents got themselves registered as proprietors of the applicant’s parcel of land and got certificate of title, the suit filed for injunction as to trespass, possession and damages relates to a different…

…The Plaintiff was aggrieved by those continuous acts of trespass to his property and therefore prayed for the first Defendant's eviction from the occupied portion of his land aforesaid and also prayed for a permanent injunction…

…This is not an application for a mandatory injunction, it is one brought under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act.…

…outset the AFC maintained that the plaintiff, that is, the appellant, was its “loanee”, that the appellant was in default and that the AFC was fully justified in seizing the pick-up, and (in the Notice of Objection to the injunction…