Search court decisions

…In this case, the hearing notice for today has been served.…

…We are informed by the clerk of the court, that when a notice of hearing is issued, it is not the registry’s practice to specify, in addition, that the application to strike out will be heard because, the appellant being…

…This ground alone merited the appellant’s appeal to be admitted to hearing in the superior court. Summary rejection of that appeal was therefore wrong.…

…Accordingly, we allow the appellant’s appeal to this court, set aside the superior court’s order summarily rejecting the appellant’s appeal to that court and order that the said appeal be admitted to hearing by the superior…

…Thereafter, the Tribunal file got lost and the appeal could not be processed for hearing.…

…By a ruling dated 11th June, 2004, the superior court ordered that the dispute be taken back to the Tribunal for hearing de novo and that the appeal be marked as withdrawn with each party bearing its own costs.…

…There is inherent power to restore a case for hearing after it has been dismissed under order 16 rule 6. 2.…

…It follows from this quotation that there is an inherent power to restore a case for hearing after it has been dismissed under order 16, r 6.…

…In the first of them, Lovelock v Margo [1963] 2 ALL ER, 13 the court rejected further reasons advanced at the hearing for refusing consent to the assignment, and held that the reason given at the time of the refusal amounted…

…last two authorities assist the respondents case here, for it is in dispute on the affidavits that there ever was a refusal of consent, or even an opportunity to refuse it, and the only reason given was advanced at the hearing…

…In addition to the above aspect, there is the issue whether or not the applicant is entitled to stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of an appeal.…

…At the hearing of the application, it must be demonstrated that the applicant will suffer substantial loss if the order on stay is denied.…

…It seeks an order to stay proceedings herein pending the hearing and determination of the Plaintiffs appeal already filed in the Court of Appeal CIVIL APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2007, against the decision of this Court dated 27th November…

…01.08.2006 to strike out this suit and the same was never served upon the Plaintiffs until 08.01.2007(five(5) months after filing and almost two(2) months after the Ruling of 27.11.2006 which application is now fixed for hearing…

…It seeks an order to stay proceedings herein pending the hearing and determination of the Plaintiffs appeal already filed in the Court of Appeal CIVIL APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2007, against the decision of this Court dated 27th November…

…01.08.2006 to strike out this suit and the same was never served upon the Plaintiffs until 08.01.2007(five(5) months after filing and almost two(2) months after the Ruling of 27.11.2006 which application is now fixed for hearing…

…Further by dint of the decision to commute the sentence of death to life, he was denied the right on access to court and that limitation was in breach of Article 48 and the fundamental right to a fair and public hearing in…

…According to the equal protection of the Law under Article 27 and right to a fair hearing, in Article 50 of the Constitution, the candors of the prerogative of mercy incorporates the bounds of natural justice and due process…

…judge in assessing general damages failed to appreciate or to consider the fact that although the loss of one eye by itself would not be regarded as so serious an injury as the loss of one hand or one leg or the loss of hearing…

…in one ear, the loss of sight in both eyes would be a lot more serious than the loss of two legs or two hands or the total loss of hearing, and he should have awarded damages in the light of awards for such injuries.…

…(viii) THAT the Applicant despite being afforded a second bite at the cherry during the hearing failed to lay a basis for scrutiny, recount or production of the electoral materials.…

…Amana -versusIEBC & 2 Others, the Court emphasized the Recent trend is that Scrutiny can only be ordered where a Petitioner lays sufficient basis after he has adduced evidence during the actual hearing of the Petition.…

…judge in assessing general damages failed to appreciate or to consider the fact that although the loss of one eye by itself would not be regarded as so serious an injury as the loss of one hand or one leg or the loss of hearing…

…in one ear, the loss of sight in both eyes would be a lot more serious than the loss of two legs or two hands or the total loss of hearing, and he should have awarded damages in the light of awards for such injuries.…

…(viii) THAT the Applicant despite being afforded a second bite at the cherry during the hearing failed to lay a basis for scrutiny, recount or production of the electoral materials.…

…Amana -versusIEBC & 2 Others, the Court emphasized the Recent trend is that Scrutiny can only be ordered where a Petitioner lays sufficient basis after he has adduced evidence during the actual hearing of the Petition.…

…inter-meddling, committing waste and or entering Plot No. 759/11 Ndagani, Plot No. 053/053 (market stall) Chuka, Plot No. 054/054 (market stall) Chuka, KARINGANI/NDAGANI/763, KARINGANI/NDAGANI/716 and MWANJATI/MARIANI/4779 pending hearing…

…The suit should be set down for hearing.”…