Judgment[2020] KEELC 203
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
…Basically, the respondent argues that the application is fatally defective for inordinate delay and no sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant to justify grant of the reliefs applied for in the motion.…
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
…Basically, the respondent argues that the application is fatally defective for inordinate delay and no sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant to justify grant of the reliefs applied for in the motion.…
Division and case type: Environment and LandCase
…Basically, the respondent argues that the application is fatally defective for inordinate delay and no sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant to justify grant of the reliefs applied for in the motion.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsConstitutional Petition
…Basically, the respondent argues that the application is fatally defective for inordinate delay and no sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant to justify grant of the reliefs applied for in the motion.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…defective, as no leave was sought as contemplated under Section 15, and in compliance with Section 16 of the Supreme Court Act, 2011; further the application does not fall under within the appellate jurisdiction of this…
…Court as contemplated under Section 19 of the Supreme Court Act, 2011; (d). the application is fatally defective, as it does not invoke the specic procedural clause in Rule 26 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2012; and (e). the…