Search court decisions

…be satisfied that the additional evidence is not utilized for the purpose of removing lacunae and filling gaps in evidence.…

…The Court must find the further evidence needful.…

…producing this evidence.…

…on the evidence before it.…

…the party seeking to adduce the additional evidence.…

…(i)   The Court must be satisfied that the additional evidence is not utilized for the purpose of removing lacunae and filing gaps in evidence. The Court must find the further evidence needful.…

…party seeking to adduce the additional evidence.…

…(i) The Court must be satisfied that the additional evidence is not utilized for the purpose of removing lacunae and filing gaps in evidence. The Court must find the further evidence needful.…

…Section 78 (1) (d) of the Civil Procedure Act grants the court power to take additional evidence or to require the evidence to be taken.…

…be satisfied that the additional evidence is not utilized for the purpose of removing lacunae and filling gaps in evidence.…

…The 3rd respondent averred that the new evidence was intended to fill up the gaps in the evidence that was adduced by the appellants in the lower court.…

…be satisfied that the additional evidence is not utilized for the purpose of removing lacunae and filling gaps in evidence.…

…be satisfied that the additional evidence is not utilized for the purpose of removing lacunae and filling gaps in evidence.…

…The Court must find the further evidence needful.…

…satisfied that the additional evidence is not utilized for the purpose of removing lacunae and filling gaps in evidence.…

…of the case, no evidence whatsoever has been produced to show that the applicant made any efforts to obtain that evidence either before filing the suit or during the hearing of the case.…

…“the Court must be satisfied that the additional evidence is not utilized for the purpose of removing lacunae and filling gaps in evidence. The Court must find the further evidence needful.” 10.…

…evidence on the other.” 18.   …

…stand, it should be slow to differ from findings of fact unless it is satisfied that the trial court failed to appreciate the weight or bearing of the evidence, acted on no evidence, misapprehended the evidence, took into…

…In the absence of credible evidence impeaching that process, those documents constitute cogent evidence of a prima facie lawful allocation. 43.   …

…be satisfied that the additional evidence is not utilized for the purpose of removing lacunae and filling gaps in evidence.…

…The Court must find the further evidence needful.…

…The Applicant seeks the following: i) Leave of this Court to adduce additional evidence on appeal.…

…Second, the 1st Respondent contends that the Appellant had prior knowledge of the evidence. Third, the 1st Respondent argues that the evidence the Appellant intends to adduce is irrelevant and lacks probative value.…

…The Applicant seeks the following: i) Leave of this Court to adduce additional evidence on appeal.…

…Second, the 1st Respondent contends that the Appellant had prior knowledge of the evidence. Third, the 1st Respondent argues that the evidence the Appellant intends to adduce is irrelevant and lacks probative value.…

…be satisfied that the additional evidence is not utilized for the purpose of removing lacunae and filling gaps in evidence.…

…The Court must find the further evidence needful.…

…affidavit evidence.…

…the adducing of viva voce evidence.…

…other evidence.…

…Expert evidence should be tested against known facts as it is the primary factual evidence which is of the greatest importance.…

…Whether the learned Magistrate misdirected herself on the evidence, disregarded material evidence or introduced extraneous material. iv.   …

…This Court has therefore re-evaluated the entire evidence on record while according due deference to the learned Magistrate’s assessment of the witnesses and the evidence.…

…On admissibility of photographic evidence 28.         …

…On the admissibility of electronic evidence, Section 106B of the Evidence Act governs the admissibility of electronic records.…

…to patch up his weak points or fill in gaps in evidence. 15.…

…the defendant is yet to adduce his evidence and can be allowed liberty to also expand his witnesses or documents to counter whatever new evidence the plaintiff may present.…