Judgment[1987] KECA 76
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…Ground 2A has not been objected to; and covers the dispute that if the judge found that the warehousemen had not delegated to Securicor any part of their duty of care to the plaintiff, the judge was in error in holding Securicor…
…liable to the plaintiff, on the basis that Securicor owed the plaintiff a duty of care, and holding Securicor liable to the plaintiff for the theft of the goods.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…It was also under a duty of care to the plaintiff to provide a safe system of working and not to expose him to risk.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…there are indeed other allegations in paragraphs 4 and 8 which make it perfectly clear that the accident happened at work in circumstances which established on the balance of probabilities that the defendants failed in the duty…
…of care which they owed to the plaintiff.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…These ingeneous deductions from combined speed and braking distances however correct ignore the question of fourth defendant’s duty of care.…