Search court decisions

…THIRD RULING This court made orders on 6th March 2000 in favour of the defendant. They allege to have moved to execute those orders but were not allegedly obeyed.…

…orders for 6 months or such a period that will meet the interest of justice for contempt of orders of this court given on 6th March 2000 and that costs be provided for.…

…Upon hearing of the said Application, this Court by Consent Orders crafted by the Parties on 3rd December, 2014 granted him the following orders; a.…

…The Petition was mentioned again on 2nd July, 2015 on which date the Court vacated its orders of 3rd December 2014. In its Ruling on that date the Court stated partly as follows; “I agree with Mrs.…

…The principle upon which the Court orders preliminary point is now trite following Court of Appeal decision in the case of MUKISA BISCUIT MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED vs.…

…That in matters of disobedience the procedure of court orders under order XXXIX of the Civil Procedure Code, a way of dealing with the situation is set out in rule 7.…

…under sub-rule (1) unless- (a) the court is satisfied that substantial loss may result to the applicant unless the order is made and that the application has been made without unreasonable delay and (b) such security as the court…

…orders for the due performance of such decree or order as may ultimately be binding on him has been given by the applicant.”…

…For these reasons he asks that the court orders the realease of the money to the applicant.…

…orders them to do so.…

…For these reasons he asks that the court orders the realease of the money to the applicant.…

…orders them to do so.…

…All counsel said, which is true, is that court orders must be obeyed even those arising out of a consent order between the parties.…

…The general principle is that orders of the court must be obeyed and a litigant who deliberately and without proper excuse disobeys such an order is not allowed to proceed. I noted that Mr.…

…We do no more than observe finally that it would appear that Mr Gautama himself is described in the body of the document as the person moving the court. Orders accordingly.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…Further that seeking orders of the court on forged titles borders on contempt of court. 18. Counsel cited Giella vs Cassman Brown (supra) for the conditions of grant of a temporary injunction.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…Further that seeking orders of the court on forged titles borders on contempt of court. 18. Counsel cited Giella vs Cassman Brown (supra) for the conditions of grant of a temporary injunction.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…Further that seeking orders of the court on forged titles borders on contempt of court. 18. Counsel cited Giella vs Cassman Brown (supra) for the conditions of grant of a temporary injunction.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…Further that seeking orders of the court on forged titles borders on contempt of court. 18. Counsel cited Giella vs Cassman Brown (supra) for the conditions of grant of a temporary injunction.…

…He stated that the suit properties do not belong to the Petitioner and thus it was trying to obtain court orders by fraud.…

…Further that seeking orders of the court on forged titles borders on contempt of court. 18. Counsel cited Giella vs Cassman Brown (supra) for the conditions of grant of a temporary injunction.…

…I would, for the aforegoing reasons, allow the appeal, set aside the High Court and resident magistrate’s court orders, set aside the ex parte judgment entered on March 29, 1979 and remit this case to the resident magistrate…

…THAT if the Honourable Court grants the Orders sought, this is likely to throw the sugar industry into further confusion and disarray and will amount to usurpation for the role of the Kenya Sugar Board and therefore rendering…

…to issuing Orders to secure them an allotment of sugar to be imported by themselves in a well calculated scheme to unlawfully secure an allotment of tax free sugar importation and surpass the regulatory framework put in…

…The 1st respondent had asked the High Court orders for, inter alia, (a) an interlocutory injunction to restrain the appellants by themselves, agents servants or otherwise howsoever, from purporting to hold out or act or conduct…