Search court decisions

…The short point that arose for consideration before the Chamber Summons dated 16.3.99 was prosecuted, was whether a letter addressed to Counsel for the Plaintis/Respondents by Counsel for the Defendant/Applicant on 2.6.98…

….……….RESPONDENT RULING The applicant Jonathan Mungai Wainaina applies to me by chamber summons under section 123(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code for bail pending his trial.…

….…...........DEFENDANTS RULING The two applicants Jared Otieno Abok (1st defendant) and Tobias Omondi Abok (2nd defendant) ask me by their Chamber Summons dated 20th June, 1989 and filed in court on 30th June, 1989 for several…

…Summons be deemed to have been duly filed and lastly that the costs of this application be provided for.…

…DEFENDANT R U L I N G The defendant invoked the discretionary power of this court under Order XX rule 11 (2) of the civil Procedure rules by filing a chamber summons dated 10th September, 2003 in which he sought to liquidate…

…What can be discerned from the chamber summons and the supporting affidavit of George Karolyi sworn on 11th September, 2003 is that the defendant is unable to settle the decretal sum at one go but can gradually settle by…

…Filed along the plaint is a Chamber Summons in which the plaintiff seeks interim orders of injunction to issue under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules based on the grounds that the piece of land in question…

…Consequently the plaint filed in this court and Chamber Summons dated the 12th May 2003 amounts to abuse of the process of court and are hereby struck out under Order VI Rule 13(1) (d) of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…The application concerned the exercise of judicial discretion under order IXA rule 10 and 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules even though these provisions were not shown in the chamber summons application. 2.…

…This application thus concerns the exercise of my judicial discretion under order IXA rule 10 and 11 of the Civil Procedure Code even though the same order and rules were not shown in the chamber summons filed by the applicant…

…The decision was given on a chamber summons taken out by the defendants under Order 6 rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Rules (the Rules) against the plaintiff for orders that: (1) the plaintiff has no cause of action against…

…Thereafter the defendants took out a chamber summons under order 6 rule 13 of the Rules seeking (i) an order that the plaintiff has no cause of action against the defendants; (ii) an order that the plaint discloses no cause…

…At the time of filing his plaint against the respondents/defendants on the 11th of January, 1991, he made an application by way of chamber summons expressed to have been brought under certificate of urgency for the attachment…

…On the following day, the defendant’s filed an application in court by way of chamber summons through M/s Mukira Mbaya & Co Advocates in which they sought among other orders, that the ex-parte judgment obtained against them…

…In paragraph 7 of the affidavit sworn by the defendant’s manager in reply to the present chamber summons seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendant from selling this particular vehicle to anyone else pending…

…Together with the plaint the plaintiffs filed a chamber summons dated 1.3.2004 under order 39 Rule 2(1), (2) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Rules, Rules 12(5) and (7) of the Children’s Act (No. 8 of 2001) General Rules and…

…I shall first of all deal with the issue of competence of the application which has been brought by way of chamber summons under Order 41 Rule 4 of the Civil procedure Rules. In his reply to Mr.…

…Together with the plaint the plaintiffs filed a chamber summons dated 1.3.2004 under order 39 Rule 2(1), (2) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Rules, Rules 12(5) and (7) of the Children’s Act (No. 8 of 2001) General Rules and…

…I shall first of all deal with the issue of competence of the application which has been brought by way of chamber summons under Order 41 Rule 4 of the Civil procedure Rules. In his reply to Mr.…

….…………..RESPONDENTS RULING This application is brought by Chamber Summons under Order IXB rule 8 and O XXI rule 22 Civil Procedure Rules. The applicants are the defendants in the suit.…

…On 16th May, 1989 an application by Chamber Summons was filed. It was expressed to be brought under O IXB rule 8 Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of Civil Procedure Act. Two orders were prayed for.…

…The applicant’s application under Prayer 3 of the Chamber Summons dated 9th August, 2011 is not clear as to what the applicant wants as it seems to be seeking an injunction order on one part and the other to be seeking for…

…What is stated here is gained from the appellant’s affidavit dated May 12, 1986 in support of the chamber summons filed on May 13, 1986.…

…On August 24th, 1988, Bosire J dismissed the chamber summons with costs. “for want of prosecution”.…

…In it Mr Taib Ali Taib certified that the chamber summons was urgent and should be heard quickly because “it would otherwise be rendered nugatory”. This was on Friday March 5, 1993.…

…She perused the chamber summons. She perused the supporting affidavits deponed by the applicants. And upon looking generally at the pleadings filed, she granted temporary orders.…