Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…According to him, the Plaintiff’s application was aimed at defeating their claim which they had acquired by operation of law. When the application came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the Applicant Mr.…
…This is not an application for a mandatory injunction, it is one brought under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act.…
Division and case type: CriminalCase number Criminal Application
…In the present application, the applicant was previously charged with the same offence before the Chief Magistrate’s Court Nakuru before the proceedings were terminated and then transferred to the Naivasha Chief Magistrate…
…I allow the application as a consequence of which I will set aside the order on bail by the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Naivasha. I will substitute the same with an appropriate order of this court.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…That costs of the application be provided for. The application is supported by a supporting affidavit of Paul Chemwono the Managing Director.…
…the main body of the application. 2.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
….……....RESPONDENT RULING The Memorandum of appeal was filed on 21st October, 2009 simultaneously with application for stay of execution.…
…On 9th March, 2011, the respondent in the appeal brought the present application for orders that the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution for the reason that ten months (at the time of filing of this application) had…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
…REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2004 (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 3160 of 2003 of the Principal Magistrate’s Court at NAIVASHA) HOSEA KIBIWOTT…
…The application was not opposed by the prosecution.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…Machio, for the applicants, urged me, equallystrongly, to set up a bench of two Judges to hear the Review application.…
…They cannot proceed forever, going back and forth in courtin one form of application or another.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…Machio, for the applicants, urged me, equallystrongly, to set up a bench of two Judges to hear the Review application.…
…They cannot proceed forever, going back and forth in courtin one form of application or another.…
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
…The application was supported by an affidavit sworn by Terry C.…
…The petitioner, William Kiprop Komen opposed the application and filed an affidavit sworn on 18th May, 2004.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…That this application be heard inter-partes on 29.8.95. 4. That the costs of this application do abide the outcome of the application.…
…The application is opposed by the defendants who have filed their own application to strike out the Applicant’s application. They gave notice of legal objections.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…discharge voucher and certainly this is an argument which would as well raise a triable issue which cannot be disposed of by way of this application.…
…In my view this application is misconceived if not bad in law for trying to drag a third party into a case without following the relevant procedures.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…The application is supported by the affidavit in support, annextures and oral submissions in Court.…
…This gave rise to this application by which the plaintiff seeks to strike out the defence on the grounds specified.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The appellant applied that this judgment be set aside but the learned Resident Magistrate dismissed the application on 17th March 1992, hence the present appeal.…
…That this act amounted to negligence on his part to warrant the dismissal of the application to set aside ex-parte judgment.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…The Plaintiff’s Advocate opposed the application for adjournment and the Court agreed with her that because the Defendant’s Advocate had had ample opportunity to withdraw, he had not done so and was not entitled to an adjournment…