Search court decisions

…NAIROBI/BLOCK 263/1163, in Nairobi pending the hearing and determination of the Application and Petition. f. The costs of this Application be provided for. 2.…

…Whether the Petitioner/Applicant is entitled to the orders sought in the application. b. Who shall bear the costs of the application? Analysis and Determination A.…

…RESPONDENTS RULING There is before the Court an interlocutory application in this petition.…

…That pending the hearing of this application all proceedings be stayed. And 3. That the petitioner do pay the costs of the first respondent in Respect of the Petition as well as of this application.…

…It was pointed out that the application on jurisdiction was made before the Trial Court when there was a similar application pending determination before the High Court. It was stated that in the lower court, Mr.…

…Magolo indicated that they failed to disclose to this court about High Court Constitutional Petition No. 50 of 2020 but it had no bearing to the application before this court, as this application was made pursuant to the…

…Nassir is of the contrary view and urges the court to dismiss the application more so as no security has been provided in terms of order 41 rule 4 (2) (b) of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…It does not appear to me that they stand to suffer any substantial loss if the orders sought in this application are not granted. I specifically dealt with this matter in my ruling.…

…Nassir is of the contrary view and urges the court to dismiss the application more so as no security has been provided in terms of order 41 rule 4 (2) (b) of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…It does not appear to me that they stand to suffer any substantial loss if the orders sought in this application are not granted. I specifically dealt with this matter in my ruling.…

…The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by applicant John Warui. The suit between the two parties arises from a Hire Purchase Agreement entered into by them on October 8, 1997.…

…In the affidavit in reply to the application, it is deponed that as at April 27, 2000 the applicant was in arrears of Kshs 1,896,075.…

…Upon application he was allowed to submit in opposition of the application on the basis of the pleadings and the law only. In support of the application the plaintiff swore one affidavit.…

…This application was then rendered necessary.…

…substituted service through the print media and the application was xed for hearing today. 5.…

…Njoroge then made an application for adjournment on two main grounds:- 1.…

…The background to this application is that the principal applicant in this miscellaneous cause (Pius Wamalabe) filed an application dated 10/6/04 under S.146 (Cap 242) and S. 3A Civil Procedure Act seeking orders that the…

…On 11-6-04 Khaminwa J certified the application urgent and directed that the application be served on the Hon. The Attorney General and all interested parties. It was to be heard on 21-6-04.…

…Although Mr Mburu Kariuki opposes this application on the grounds that the application is misconceived and bad in law; that the application has been overtaken by events as attachment of the defendant’s property has been effected…

…and that there are no chances of the appeal succeeding, I think most of those matters are not relevant factors for consideration in this application.…

…that the application is incompetent .…

…The application comeslate because in execution of that same order of mandamus the 17.…

…DEBTOR RULING This is an application by the objector to the attachment of motor vehicle KXK 245 in execution of the decree in this suit. The application is brought under order XXI r 56 of the Civil Procedure Code.…

…This is an application by Messrs A Y A Jiwaji & Jiwaji who are now acting for the defendant for dismissal of this suit for want of prosecution.…

…That application was listed for hearing on April 14, 1983.…

…The Application is supported by the affidavit of the second defendant.…

…We have not been told why they did not oppose the application. The defence was struck out on the 23rd November 2000. This application was not brought until the 3rd August 2005 after execution had issued.…

…The first one is that the learned Principal magistrate erred in proceeding to hear the two applications in the face of the stay order in HC Misc. Civil Application Number 261 of 2006.…

…The second issue that the Appellant was not given sufficient notice for the hearing of the applications has equally no merit. The applications had been served much earlier.…

…Twelve months elapsed before an application was brought. An application was brought after the suit had abated. The application was not argued.…

…Had the parties not entered into a consent order with regard to the orders which were sought in that application the court would have considered the application on the merits.…

…The application is supported by the affidavit of one Yasmin Abdulkarim Ali, who was the then advocate for the plaintiff when the application was filed.…

…Mr Congo argued the application before me. No other affidavit apart from that sworn by Mrs Ali was filed on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendant, Container Freight Co Ltd, opposes the application.…

…The defendants brought ann application seeking security for costs under Order XXV rule 1 and section 401 of the Companies Act.…

…The application is brought under order XXV r1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and s 401 of the Companies. Nothing specifically turns on the rules under which the application has been filed.…

….…….3RD DEFENDANT RULING AND/OR DIRECTIONS A fundamental issue has arisen in respect of the application dated 30.10.2010 by the 1st Defendant and which all parties agree will have crucial consequences or ramifications depending…

…In particular the court will have to be told the possible effect of this on the 3 pending applications and the entire suit. Dated at Mombasa this 16th day of December 2010. M.K. IBRAHIM J U D G E…