Search court decisions

…For this argument he relies on the affidavit of Mr Mwai Solomon Githegi, the Town Clerk of the Council wherein he deponed, inter alia, as follows:- 7.…

…Mr Mwakiwiwi who instructed Messrs Arum and Company Advocates to handle this particular file on the Council’s behalf has sworn his own (replying) affidavit.…

…Paragraphs 4-6 of the Petitioner's affidavit of 15th September 2011 in support of the Petition sets out the factual background from the petitioner's perspective as follows: “4.…

…My grandmother died on 26/5/2005 after she had already executed the transfer marked as “AMM3” in the affidavit in the support of the Petition. ii.…

…authorised representatives such as their secretaries, managing directors etc, have sworn any affidavit in support of their respective claims.…

…Instead, their advocates took it upon themselves to swear affidavits on their behalf.…

…The defendant swore the supporting affidavit to support the summons.…

…The plaintiff filed a replying affidavit to resist the summons.…

…The application is supported by the affidavit of Mr Magugu sworn on 7th December, 1994.…

…In their grounds of objection and replying affidavit, Mr Magugu and Inns Ltd contended that it was a condition for the payment of the respondents’ fees that Inns Ltd obtained finances to undertake the project; that Inns Ltd…

…DEFENDANT R U L I N G Under O.38 r 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules this court may at any stage of proceedings upon being satisfied either by Affidavit or otherwise that the defendant with intent to obstruct or delay the execution…

…The plaintiff swore an Affidavit to that effect and also called the witness who not only swore an Affidavit in further support but also gave Viva Voce evidence.…

…He has annexed an agreement to his affidavit which, according to him, verifies the dissolution of the said marriage.…

…The Plaintiff’s affidavit is categorical that a marriage under Taita Customary Law subsists between her and the 1st Defendant.…

…The application is supported by affidavit of the applicant sworn on 19/9/88 in which he depones inter alia that he has never been served with summons to enter appearance; that it is on 30/8/ 87 when court broker came to his…

…Mr Kassamali Mohamed Noorani does not in his affidavit mention the issue of service. Mr Kasmani for respondent however referred to return of service and said that service was proper.…

…Consequently prior to the hearing hereof, the parties by consent agreed to have the affidavits by the drivers of the vehicles to be treated as evidence in this case.…

…The plaintiff in addition to the affidavit evidence and evidence in the lower court called three witnesses while the defendant called 1 witness.…

…Consequently prior to the hearing hereof, the parties by consent agreed to have the affidavits by the drivers of the vehicles to be treated as evidence in this case.…

…The plaintiff in addition to the affidavit evidence and evidence in the lower court called three witnesses while the defendant called 1 witness.…

…My hunch is that counsel for the Appellant who had not filed replying affidavits or grounds of opposition to those applications was not ready to argue them and instead of saying so he asserted that the matter had been stayed…

…The application is supported by affidavits sworn by ATUL SHAH dated 8th May, 2007 and ROBERT FOULSER dated 24th January, 2007. The application was strongly contested.…

…At page 11 of the same I find an observation by the learned Judge as follows: “That to my view means that either by affidavit or the pleadings the Plaintiff ought to firstly show that the Defendant is likely to leave the…

…The application is supported by affidavits sworn by ATUL SHAH dated 8th May, 2007 and ROBERT FOULSER dated 24th January, 2007. The application was strongly contested.…

…At page 11 of the same I find an observation by the learned Judge as follows: “That to my view means that either by affidavit or the pleadings the Plaintiff ought to firstly show that the Defendant is likely to leave the…

…The motion is supported by the affidavit of the first respondent (hereinafter referred to as “Chiaba”) in which he swears to the fact that he was not served personally or at all.…

…It is suprising therefore that the supporting affidavit says nothing of having seen these documents. It is absolutely silent.…