Judgment[1999] KECA 100
MUNGAI MUNA v ESMAEL N. MUNGAI
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appli 32 of 1998 MUNGAI MUNA...........................................................................................................APPLICANT AND ESMAEL N. MUNGAI..............................................................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appli 32 of 1998 MUNGAI MUNA...........................................................................................................APPLICANT AND ESMAEL N. MUNGAI..............................................................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COME TO AFRICA SAFARIS LIMITED............................................................... APPELLANT AND BARCLAYS BANK OF KENYA LIMITED..........................................................RESPONDENT (An Appeal from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hon.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO J.A (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.NAI. 214 OF 1998 BETWEEN NATIONAL CEREALS & PRODUCE BOARD.......................APPLICANT AND ALBERT ONGARO..........................................RESPONDENT R U L I N G I have read the notice of motion and the affidavit in support thereof.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Tunoi, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1469 OF 1998 (From Original Conviction(s) and Sentence(s) in Criminal Case No 738 of 1998 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at GATUNDU.) DANIEL GITAU MUCHAU.......................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.................................................................RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T The appellant allegedly pleaded guilty to the offence of defilement of a girl under the age of 1
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: KWACH, SHAH & OWUOR JJ.A CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 118/98) BETWEEN NYANJA HOLDINGS LIMITED GEORGE NJAU MBUGUA NYANJA MRS.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
HALL EQUITORIAL LTD v OLYMIPC FRUIT PROCESSORS: ORDER Ruling delivered. E’ O’KUBASU JUDGE
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
what I need to consider in this taxation bearing in mind the Authorities cited, I have come to a conclusion that Ksh.120,000/= would be reasonable fee for instructions in this appeal which I allow. Ksh.180,000/= is taxed off from this item.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
instant case as at 6th July 1995 when the consent letter was written and 24th July 1995 when the order was signed, M/s. Meenye Company advocates was not acting for the plaintiff.
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
REPUBLIC OF KENYA HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) Prob & Admin Cause 172 of 1988 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GATUTHU NJUGUNA (DECEASED) Issue: Whether, under the Law of Succession Act, the Registrar of the High Court has power to perform the duties and carry out responsibilities of an executor or administrator of the estate of a deceased person. RULING I do not intend to write a long ruling.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
decision of Lakha, J.A., a learned single judge of this Court, to seek to vary, discharge or reverse his order by the Court under the provisions of rule 54 (2) of the Rules. Oraro has submitted that the respondent having not chosen any of those options he cannot now challenge the consent order which he has not attempted to have set aside.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Alongside the plaint, the plaintiffs filed an application by way of Chamber Summons seeking orders that the plaintiffs be restored by way of a mandatory injunction into possession of L.R. 209/8258 forthwith, that the defendant be restrained from interfering with the plaintiffs’ enjoyment of the suit property until this suit is heard and determined, that the defendants be restrained from interfering with the running of the plaintiffs business on L.R.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, TUNOI & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 82 OF 1998 BETWEEN DAIMA BANK LIMITED ...............................1ST APPELLANT KANGETHE & COMPANY ...............................2ND APPELLANT WHITESTONE AUCTIONEERS (K) LIMITED ...............3RD APPELLANT AND K.
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI Civil Appli 23 of 1998 VIHIGA MILLERS & HIGHES LTD ...........................................................................APPELLANT AND NIFREDA MUDOLA................................................................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 933 of 1996 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPERS LTD............................................................. PLAINTIFF VERSUS SAUTI HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 933 of 1996 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPERS LTD............................................................. PLAINTIFF VERSUS SAUTI HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1887 OF 1994 KENYA POWER AND LIGHTING COMPANY LTD........................................PLAINTIFF versus NJILUX MOTORS LIMITED............................................................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G This is an application by Notice of Motion under order 41 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules for an order that there be a stay of execution of the decree/order of this court dated 21st May, 1998 pend
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Criminal Appeal 315 of 1993 and 346 of 1993 JOSEPH AKETCH OMORO...................... APPELLANT —versusREPDBLIC................................................RESPONDENT CONSOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO, 346 OF 1993 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Criminal Appeal 315 of 1993 and 346 of 1993 JOSEPH AKETCH OMORO...................... APPELLANT —versusREPDBLIC................................................RESPONDENT CONSOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO, 346 OF 1993 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.