Judgment[1984] KEHC 8
Othulo v Republic
High Court at NairobiCase number Criminal Appeal 750 of 1984
CriminalCriminal Appeal
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
CriminalCriminal Appeal
Othulo v Republic High Court, at Nairobi November 12, 1984 Abdulla J Criminal Appeal 750 of 1984 Criminal law - indecent assault - allegation of frame up - whether the evidence was tainted to warrant reversal of conviction. The appellant was convicted for the offence of indecent assault contrary to section 144(1) of the Penal Code.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI ( Coram: Kneller, Hancox JJA & Nyarangi Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 150 OF 1983 BETWEEN RICHARD KAITANY CHEMAGONG..................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.......................................................................................RESPOND (Appeal from the High Court at Eldoret, Mbaya J)
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA MWAURA GATHOGO MUKONO KARANJA .................………………………………………....................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS NEPATAO OLE PUNYUA................…………………………......................................
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL 297 OF 1984 AMOS MBURU GATHAGU..........................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC................................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Thika, RN Kamiro Esq)
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
advocates for all the parties had agreed on the quotum of damages and hence the following consent order was recorded by this court. “By consent judgment for the plaintiff against all the defendants jointly and severally in the inclusive sum of shs 2,153,500 inclusive of costs with court disbursements to be paid by the defendants.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPEAL 38 OF 1984 HENRY NDERITU …………………………………. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ………………………………………..
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL APPEAL 94 OF 1984 MWANGI CHEGE ……………………………………..APPELLANT (Original Accused I) v e r s u s REPUBLIC ……………………………………………..REPSONDENT CONSLOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL 94 OF 1984 (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case 13268 of 1983 of the Resident Magistrate’ Court at Makadara, R M Njiru Esq) THIONGO MWANGI …………………………………APPELLANT (Original Accused2) v e r s u s REPUBLIC …………………………………………….RESPONDEN
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
On 19th January, 1983, in the presence of all the parties and their advocates, the trial judge made an order by which the dispute was referred to District Officer, Nyeri for arbitration with the help of four elders, two each side, the award to be filed in court within 120 days. The appeal is against the judgment entered on 9th August, 1983, in terms of the award, on the grounds set out in the memorandum of appeal.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL 86 OF 83 BETWEEN ANUCHPAND MEGHJI RUPA SHAH VIJAY KUMAR MEGHJI SHAH ……………. APPELLANTS AND REPUBLIC ………………………………………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL SUIT NO 1786 OF 1984 ANASTASIA KAMENE CHEGE…………………………………………......................PLAINTIFF AND LAWRENCE NDUATI KIGUTA…………………………………………....................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller Hancox JJ A and Chesoni Ag J A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 37 OF 1984 BETWEEN GILBERT CHEGE ………………………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ………………………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: KNELLER, HANCOX & NYARANGI JJA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 177 OF 1984 BETWEEN KARIUKI & ANOTHER .................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC......................................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA ( Coram:Kneller, Hancox JJA & Chesoni Ag JA ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 1984 BETWEEN MBELLE......................................................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC............................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA CIVIL APPEAL 14 OF 81 CLEMENT WAMUNYAMA………………………………………….APPLICANT AND WAFULA NABIRIKI…………………..……………………………RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to file an intended appeal from the Judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega (Gicheru, J) dated December 24, 1982 In Civil Appeal 14 of 1981) __________________ JUDGMENT OF KNELLER, JA Clement Wamunyama (Wamunyana) asks for the time in which to file his record of appeal to
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI ( Coram: Kneller, Hancox JJA & Chesoni Ag JA ) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 91 OF 1983 BETWEEN NGOME............................................................................APPELLANT AND PLANTEX COMPANY LTD.......................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court of Nairobi, Gachuhi J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Potter, Kneller and Hancox, JJ.A) CIVIL APPLICATION NAI 25 OF 1983 (In the Matter of an intended appeal) BETWEEN JAMES MACHARIA GICHUKI………………………………………….....APPLICATION AND HARRY LEWIS NANGURAI…………………………………………........RESPONDENT (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Muli, J) dated March 15 1982 in Civil suit No 1038 of 1974 JUDGMENT OF KNELLER, J A We have before us a motion of notice filed on June 2 1983 by the
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Parliament until 1979, when he lost his seat; who would pay them Kshs 36,000 for carrying out that order which was described as ‘the work’. If the prosecution case was accepted there could be no question but that Charles and the second appellant were to be armed with guns when they went to arrest Tenai.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL 48 OF 84 DAVID OMUSE ODERA ………………………………… APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………………………………………………. RESPONDENT (Appeal from conviction of the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega (Gicheru J) dated 29th November1983 in Criminal Appeal No 372 of 1983) JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT When David Omuse Odera, the appellant therein, appeared before an acting Resident Magistrate at Busia on 27th October 1983 and had the charge of stealing stock contrary
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL 48 OF 84 DAVID OMUSE ODERA ………………………………… APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………………………………………………. RESPONDENT (Appeal from conviction of the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega (Gicheru J) dated 29th November1983 in Criminal Appeal No 372 of 1983) JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT When David Omuse Odera, the appellant therein, appeared before an acting Resident Magistrate at Busia on 27th October 1983 and had the charge of stealing stock contrary
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL APPEAL 138 OF 84 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No 6156 of 1983 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kibera, P E MAUNDU Esq) PATRICK MUKABI ………………………………………….APPELLANT V e r s u s REPUBLI C …………………………………………………… RESPONDENT CORAM PORTER J Appellant absent, unrepresented and not wishing to be present, C W Gatonye (Principal State Counsel) for Respondent. ------------------------------- J