Judgment[1994] KECA 94
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA ( Coram: Gachuhi, Muli & Tunoi JJ A ) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 1993 BETWEEN VICTORIA DE MEO..............................................................APPELLANT AND 1.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 56 OF 1989 PETER WAMBUA T/A NEW TAWA TYRE TRADING ………….….........………….. PLANTIFF VERSUS RETAIL HARDWARE & SANITARY STORES LTD & ANOTHER…………………..….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MERU CIVIL CASE NO 390 OF 1992(OS) KIBUNDI …………….…………….… PLAINTIFF VERSUS MUKOBWA & ANOTHER ….….... DEFENDANT RULING This is a preliminary question as to whether, by reason of the determination of the originating summons by the High Court, in the High Court Civil Case No 2411 of 1979 (OS), at Nairobi, the instant originating summons, which was also started at Nairobi but in due course was transferred here, is barred by the application of the doctrine of
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 89 OF 1989 MICAHEL MUTUA KIEMA ……….....………….… PLAINTIFF VERSUS HAGGINSON MALINDI MWANGEMI GITAL CONSTRUCTION CO LTD ………….....
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 678 OF 1990 MARY WANJIRU GACHII ……………….……… APPLICANT VERSUS KENYA BUS SERVICES (MSA) LTD…………. RESPONDENT RULING This is an application for stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CIVIL SUIT NO 142 OF 1989 THOMAS NYAIBURU NYAKANGO ………….……. PLAINTIFF VERSUS DIAMOND TRUST OF KENYA LTD…………..… DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 823 OF 1991 MATHIGU………...…… APPLICANT VERSUS MWAURA……..…………. DEBTOR RULING This is an application by the objector to the attachment of motor vehicle KXK 245 in execution of the decree in this suit.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CIVIL APPEAL NO 11 OF 1992 SECURICOR COURIER (K) LTD………....…. APPELLANT VERSUS OWINO……………………………………..
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Civil Case 842 of 1988 JOHN KAMUNYU MURIGI…………..…..….....………………..PLAINTIFF - versus - PIRI MWATATA TEITEI…………...…..………...……….1ST DEFENDANT LAND REGISTRAR – KILIFI…………………....……...2ND DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 381 OF 1989 MARIAM ABDSHEIKH D/O SALIM ABDSHEIKH .…..........….PLAINTIFF VERSUS CHARLES KENNEDY WANYA FRANCIS ONSERIC ……………………………………..RESPONDENTS
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 176 OF 1992 JOSEPH KOECH YEGO …....…….…………. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…….………………………….… RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 484 OF 1989 WALTER OBARA OGOL ………………….…. PLAINTIFF VERSUS NOAH MBUGUA NJOROGE……….……RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 151 OF 1993 BACCHUS GROCERS LTD …………….……..PLAINTIFF VERSUS CRATER AUTOMOBILE (NRB) LTD …...…..DEFENDANT RULING The dispute between the parties herein relates to a contract for sale by the defendant to the plaintiff of a new Mitsubishi Fusso lorry. It is the plaintiff’s case that on the 20th February, 1993 the defendant offered to sell to him the vehicle whose details are well described by way of a vehicle order 075, and that he acc
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
There is no difficulty in complying with an order to that effect. It was a prayer for an order allowing the applicant to manifest her religion by doing a specific and clear act, namely, wearing her headscarf.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Ahmed v Republic High Court, at Mombasa Mbaluto J December 14, 1992, Mbaluto J delivered the following Ruling. The applicant was convicted in the court below of causing death by obstruction contrary to section 46 of the Traffic Act.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Ahmed v Republic High Court, at Mombasa Mbaluto J December 14, 1992, Mbaluto J delivered the following Ruling. The applicant was convicted in the court below of causing death by obstruction contrary to section 46 of the Traffic Act.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT, AT MOMBASA Criminal Appeal No. 473 of 1991 Amungo.................................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS Republic.................................................................................DEFENDANT November 9, 1992, Wambilyanga J delivered the following Judgment.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 368 OF 1992 HABIB BANK LIMITED..........................PLAINTIFF VERSUS MOHAMED SHARIFF HASSAN..........DEFENDANT RULING In the suit (as pleaded in the plaint) the plaintiff claims from the defendant a sum of Shs 760,322/65 alleged to be the debit balance of the amount due and owing by the defendant to the plaintiff as at 16th April, 1992. This is alleged to be in respect of the bank loan or an overdraft reflected on the defe
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 649 OF 1991 AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION...........................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS CONTAINER FREIGHTERS CO LTD................................RESPONDENT RULING This application for summary judgment is brought by way of a notice of motion under order 35 rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. It seeks an order that summary judgment be entered for the plaintiff, Agricultural Development Corporat
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
quash the conviction recorded against him, set aside the sentence and orders imposed on him and order that he be released from prison forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.