Judgment[1986] KECA 70
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
declaration or an originating summons for a declaration which obtained in England before 1964. order 54A of the Rules of the Supreme Court directly provided for a declaration on an originating summons.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Kneller, Hancox & Nyarangi, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. BULEMI.........................................................APPELLANTS AND SAMSON LUWAYI...........................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a judgment/order of the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega (Aganyanya , J.) dated 29th day of May, 1985 in Civil Appeal No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU ( Coram:Hancox JA, Platt & Gachuhi Ag JJA ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 148 OF 1985 BETWEEN ANZAYA.................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC..........................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Kakamega, Aganyanya J)
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL, AT KISUMU CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 116 OF 1985 Madhupaper International Limited versus Kerr (application from the High Court at Nairobi, O’Connor J, Civil Suit 3438 of 1985) December 16, 1985, Kneller, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA delivered the following Order of the Court. Madhupaper International Limited, the company, manufacturers cartons, tissues and lavatory paper in the industrial area of Nairobi.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL, AT KISUMU CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 116 OF 1985 Madhupaper International Limited versus Kerr (application from the High Court at Nairobi, O’Connor J, Civil Suit 3438 of 1985) December 16, 1985, Kneller, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA delivered the following Order of the Court. Madhupaper International Limited, the company, manufacturers cartons, tissues and lavatory paper in the industrial area of Nairobi.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Kitavi v Cosatal Bottlers Limited Court of Appeal, at Mombasa September 10, 1985 Kneller, Hancox & Nyarangi JJA Civil Appeal No 69 of 1984 (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J) Cases 1. Paris v Stephey Borough Council (No 2) [1951] 1 AER 42 2.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Kitavi v Cosatal Bottlers Limited Court of Appeal, at Mombasa September 10, 1985 Kneller, Hancox & Nyarangi JJA Civil Appeal No 69 of 1984 (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J) Cases 1. Paris v Stephey Borough Council (No 2) [1951] 1 AER 42 2.
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 41 OF 1985 Between BATHOLOMEW MUYALE .............................APPLICANT AND SHEM NYAMBASI MULEFU ...........................DEFENDANT ELIJA NANDI CHIKAMAI................................DEFENDANT (In an intended appeal from an order of the High Court at Kakamega, Aganyanya J in Civil Suit No 13 of 1979) *************************
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 41 OF 1985 Between BATHOLOMEW MUYALE .............................APPLICANT AND SHEM NYAMBASI MULEFU ...........................DEFENDANT ELIJA NANDI CHIKAMAI................................DEFENDANT (In an intended appeal from an order of the High Court at Kakamega, Aganyanya J in Civil Suit No 13 of 1979) *************************
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KUSUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Platt Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 143 OF 1983 Between ANGUKO......................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Kisumu, Schofield J)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KUSUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Platt Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 143 OF 1983 Between ANGUKO......................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Kisumu, Schofield J)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Amigo v Republic Court of Appeal, at Kisumu June 21, 1985 Hancox JA, Platt & Gachuhi Ag JJA Criminal Appeal No 175 of 1984 (Appeal from the High Court at Kisumu, Schofield J) June 21, 1985, Hancox JA, Platt & Gachuhi Ag JJA delivered the following Judgment. The appellant Michael Otieno Amigo was described in the trial proceedings as the third accused, although in some headings he was listed the fourth.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (Coram: Masime, J.A., Gicheru & Kwach, Ag. JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller, Hancox JJA & Nyarangi Ag JA ) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 64 OF 1984 Between KENYA CARGO HANDLING SERVICES LIMITED.................APPELLANT AND DAVID UGWWANG................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL 86 OF 83 BETWEEN ANUCHPAND MEGHJI RUPA SHAH VIJAY KUMAR MEGHJI SHAH ……………. APPELLANTS AND REPUBLIC ………………………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL 48 OF 84 DAVID OMUSE ODERA ………………………………… APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………………………………………………. RESPONDENT (Appeal from conviction of the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega (Gicheru J) dated 29th November1983 in Criminal Appeal No 372 of 1983) JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT When David Omuse Odera, the appellant therein, appeared before an acting Resident Magistrate at Busia on 27th October 1983 and had the charge of stealing stock contrary
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MALINDI CIVIL APPEAL 12 OF 83 MUTUKU AND ASSOCIATES…………..………………………….APPELLANT AND FELIX R M KITONGA & BROS LTD…………………………………RESPONDENT (From the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Schofield, J) dated 16th December, 1982) Civil Suit No 65 & 513 of 1978 (Consolidated) _______________ RULING OF THE COURT HANCOX, J A It has been held, repeatedly, by this court that failure to include the formally drawn up decree or order embodying the decision of the court
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
For the foregoing reasons, we allow the appeal, quash the convictions, set aside the sentences and order that the appellant be set free forthwith unless he is otherwise lawfully detained. Delivered at Kisumu this 8th day of December, 1983 AA Kneller Judge of Appeal ZR Chesoni Ag Judge of Appeal HG Platt Ag Judge of Appeal
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: HANCOX, J A CHESONI & PLATT, AG. JJ.A CRIMINAL APPEALL NO 108 OF 1983 BETWEEN ALFAYO MARIO……………………………………………..APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC…………………………………………………RESPONDENT (Appeal from a sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Kisii (Mr E Cotran) dated 16th October, 1978 in Criminal Case No 85 of 1978 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Alfayo Mario s/o Mayaka, the appellant, was originally charged with the murder on 13thAugust, 1978, of a woman named Moraa w/o
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL 7 OF 1983 PATRICK NYAGUNDIOBEGE....,...............................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.................................................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from a sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Kisumu (Schofield, J.) dated June 13th 1983 in Criminal Case 17 of 1983 JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT Patrick Nyagundi Obege, the appellant, was co