Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU Criminal Appeal 37 of 1992 JOSEPH KIPTURGOT A TOWET……………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………….………………………………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Atogo v Agricultural Finance Corporation & another Court of Appeal at Nakuru October 23, 1991 Hancox CJ, Masime JA & Omolo Ag JA Civil Appeal No 165 of 1989 (Appeal from the judgment of the High Court at Eldoret (Aganyanya J) dated 11th August 1989 in Civil case No 163 of 1987) October 23, 1991 the following Judgments were delivered. On the 15th October, 1987, Regent Auctioneers who are official court brokers, seized a Datsun pick-up vehicle no KLR 903 belonging to the appellant, who was the p
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (Coram: Nyarangi, Cockar JJ.A & Omolo Ag. 120 OF 1990 BETWEEN JOSEPH KIMANTHI M'MNIRIDUA..............................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC...............................................RESPOND ENT (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Tanui, J.) dated 29th March, 1990 in Criminal appeal No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (CORAM: HANCOX CJ, NYARANGI JA, COCKAR Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 133 OF 1989 KIMURI……………………….. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………….RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nyeri, Abdullah J dated 22nd September 1989 in High Court Criminal Appeal No 96 of 1989)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAKURU crim app 189 of 88 OPONDO………..........…APPELLANT V REPUBLIC………….RESPONDENT Judgment. The appellant was convicted of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(1) of the Penal Code and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and six strokes of the cane followed by 5 years mandatory police supervision.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAKURU crim app 84 of 89 MUNASIA………………………APPELLANT V REPUBLIC………………..…….RESPONDENT Judgment. The appellant pleaded guilty and convicted on his plea and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NYERI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 83 OF 1990 GICHOI………………………………….APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………....RESPONDENT (From the Original Conviction and Sentence of the District Magistrate’s Court at Othaya, Gothongo DM 1, in Crminal Case No 472 of 1989)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (CORAM: HANCOX CJ, NYARANGI JA, COCKAR Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 133 OF 1989 KIMURI……………………….. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………….RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nyeri, Abdullah J dated 22nd September 1989 in High Court Criminal Appeal No 96 of 1989)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Nganga v Republic Court of Appeal, at Nyeri April 25, 1990 Masime, Gicheru & Cockar JJA Criminal Appeal No 123 of 1989 On April 25, 1990, Masime, Gicheru & Cockar JJA delivered the following Judgment. This is an appeal against a sentence of 10 years imprisonment imposed at the Nyeri High Court on 28th July, 1987 following a plea of guilty by the appellant to a charge of manslaughter.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI crim app 75 of 90 KARIUKI………………………APPELLANT V REPUBLIC………………..…….RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 172 OF 1987 BETWEEN REPUBLIC......................................... APPELLANT AND JOSEPH MURIITHI NYAMU ......................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (Coram: Platt, Gachuhi & Apaloo JJA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 182 OF 1986 BETWEEN MORGAN NDUNGU................................................ APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC...........................................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (Coram:Nyarangi, Platt & Gachuhi JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO 149 OF 1986 BETWEEN KARURU MUNYORORO....................................APPELLANT AND JOSEPH NDUMIA MURAGE............................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (Coram: Platt, Gachuhi & Apaloo JJA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 141 OF 1986 BETWEEN JOHN MBURU KINYANJUI.................................. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC..................................................................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NYERI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 120 OF 1986 JAMLICK GACHARI MUSIKIRI …….………APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC………………...........………..…RESPONDENT (Appeal From The Resident Magistrate’s Court At Kerugoya, Muchemi Esq)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPEAL 167 OF 1986 LIVINGSTONE NGURE………………………APPELLANT V REPUBLIC….………………………….………..RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (CORAM: KNELLER, NYARANGI JJA & GACHUHI Ag JA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 105 OF 1985 JAMES NDUHIU MACHARIA ……...…………….……APPELLANT VERSUS MWOTIA MACHARIA ……………………..……….RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Ruling and Order at the High Court at Nyeri, Patel J)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
is between one to ten and one to twelve. It is not difficult to arrange well-conducted parades.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
application through an advocate seeking for review of the judgment and prayer for consequential orders after the judgment to be set aside and the case to be heard on merit. The application was grounded on the fact that they being some of the defendants they were not summoned to appear before the arbitration panel and that judgment was given against them and were made to pay costs in a matter which they had not heard.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
I agree with the judgment of Nyarangi JA. The appeal will be allowed with the orders proposed by him.