Judgment[2007] KEHC 1332
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
Plaintiffs case when she observed that the Plaintiffs had not shown a prima facie case that the orders sought in their plaint could be granted. On the basis of a letter by Kodak Company in which Kodak
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
I have before me an application by the plaintiff expressed to be brought under the provisions of Order XXXIX Rules 1, 2, and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act for one primary order, save for costs, that “a temporary injunction do issue restraining the defendant whether by itself, its servants and/or employees from selling or offering for sale whether by public auction or private treaty, transferring, charging, leasing, pledging or in any other way alienati
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA Criminal Appeal 72A of 2007 (An application for bail pending appeal) ALFRED EFUMBI …………………………………….… APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ……………………………………………. RESPONDENT RULING The Appellant, ALFRED EFUMBI, was on 20th July, 2007 convicted of setting fire to crop of cultivated produce contrary to section 334 (a) of the Penal Code and sentenced by the Chief Magistrate’s court in Kakamega in Criminal Case No.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appeal 263 of 2004 ABERDARE FREIGHT SERVICES LTD………………………....APPELLANT AND KENYA REVENUE AUTHORITY……………………………….RESPONDENT (Being an appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi ( Nyamu, J.) dated 9th November 2004 in MISC APPLICATION NO. 946 OF 2004) *************************** REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT On the 9th of June, 2005 we delivered our judgment in this appeal dismissing it and reserv
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
Plaintiffs case when she observed that the Plaintiffs had not shown a prima facie case that the orders sought in their plaint could be granted. On the basis of a letter by Kodak Company in which Kodak
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Case 373 of 2006 AFRICA ECO-CAMPS LTD. …………………………… PLAINTIFF VERSUS FIDELITY COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS) Civil Suit 379 of 2004 ANTHONY AMBAKA KEGODE ……….............................……………..1ST PLAINTIFF UHAI LIMITED………………………….............................………………2ND PLAINTIFF VERSUS FOUR NINETY INVESTMENT LIMITED…….............................…..1ST DEFENDANT ADAM GRAIG OGDEN …………..……………..........................……2ND DEFENDANT EAST AFRICAN SAFARI AIR LIMITED………..........................….3RD DEFENDANT EAST AFRICAN
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS) Civil Case 371 of 2003 ECON CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING LIMITED………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS GIRO COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED………...……………..1ST DEFENDANT WAITHAKA MWANGI………………………..…………..……..2ND DEFENDANT R U L I N G The 1st defendant has moved this court, by Notice of Motion dated 13th July 2005, brought under 0XXXIX Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act. The 1st defendant seeks an
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL DIVISION, MILIMANI Civil Case 1020 of 2002 ALUTA HOLDINGS LTD………………………..………………………PLAINTIFF VERSUS RAJ PARMAR……………………………………………………..…DEFENDANT RULING In this application (by chamber summons dated 7th October, 2005) the Defendant, RAJ PARMAR, seeks an order that the Plaintiff, ALUTA HOLDINGS LTD, do serve the Defendant particulars of the plaint as requested for in the request for particulars filed on 22nd July, 2005. The Defenda
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Civil Suit 1175 of 2005 ADAM THUMI…………………………………………………………….. PLAINTIFF VERSUS MAINA KIRIRO………………………………………...……………… DEFENDANT RULING This Ruling is made in the Chamber Summons application dated 22nd September 2005 brought under Order XXXIX Rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsMiscellaneous Application
factors or to omit to consider relevant factors, and according to the Advocates Remuneration Order itself, some of the relevant factors to take into account include the nature and importance of the course or matter, the amount or value of the subject matter involved, the interest of the parties, the general conduct of the proceedings and any direction by the trial judge." In this case, the applicant has faulted the taxing officer for failing to take into account the sum which was awarded by t
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA Civil Case 189 of 1989 BENJAMIN SIPITALI MUNGWANA ……..................PLAINTIFF (NOW DECEASED) VERSUS NORAH KHAOYA SHEM) JENIPHER ACHINGO MUNGWANA) ……...………….............………. DEFENDANT AND SHEM NALIANYA SIBITALI ………………………………............……...
Division and case type: COMMERCIAL DIVISIONCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA COMMERCIAL DIVISION, MILIMANI CIVIL SUIT NO 1421 OF 2000 BILSON STEPHEN MUTUKU ……………….…………………..……...PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA COMMERCIAL BANK…………………………..……...1ST DEFENDANT DILIGENT AUCTIONEERS LTD ………………..…………….....2ND DEFENDANT SAMMY GICHUKI WAIGWA ……………………...………..……3RD DEFENDANT R U L I N G The 3rd defendant’s chamber summons dated 14th May 2004 is brought under Order 16 Rule 5 (a) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The defendant seeks an order for the di
Division and case type: CRIMINAL DIVISIONCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURST Criminal Appeal No 51 of 1986 Macharia …………………….APPELLANTS VERSUS Republic…………….……RESPONDENT JUDGMENT. Stephen Wainaina Macharia, the appellant, was convicted by a Resident Magistrate, Nairobi (Miss A Angawa) of three counts: Viz: 1.
Division and case type: CriminalCase number Criminal Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Waweru v Republic High Court, at Nairobi August 14, 1985 Schofield J Criminal Appeal No 1723, 1724 & 1725 of 1984 (Appeal from the Resident’s Magistrate’ Court at Nairobi, J A Mango, Esq) Advocates Appellants absent, unrepresented, and not wishing to be present Miss W Ngugi, for respondent August 14, 1985, Schofield J delivered the following Judgment. Jackson Waweru (1st appellant), Francis Njoroge (2nd appellant) and Nelson Mwaniki (3rd appellant) were three of four accused
Division and case type: CRIMINAL DIVISIONMiscellaneous Criminal Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Waweru v Republic High Court, at Nairobi August 14, 1985 Schofield J Criminal Appeal No 1723, 1724 & 1725 of 1984 (Appeal from the Resident’s Magistrate’ Court at Nairobi, J A Mango, Esq) Advocates Appellants absent, unrepresented, and not wishing to be present Miss W Ngugi, for respondent August 14, 1985, Schofield J delivered the following Judgment. Jackson Waweru (1st appellant), Francis Njoroge (2nd appellant) and Nelson Mwaniki (3rd appellant) were three of four accused
Division and case type: Employment and Labour RelationsCase number Cause
IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI. KENYA UNION OF DOMESTIC, HOTELS, EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, HOSPITALS & ALLIED WORKERS................Claimants.
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 158 OF 1998 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GLADWELL MUMBI NJOROGE (DECEASED) RULING The applicant herein John Njoroge by way of application by summons dated 28/8/1999 seeks for the revocation of the grant granted to Margaret Rohio and Jane Tatua on 8/4/1988 for reasons that:- a.
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: O’KUBASU, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS)) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Succession Cause 414 of 1984 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF PAUL NENE METHA – DECEASED RULING Peter Kimani Nene and Fredrick Kimani filed the Petition for grant of representation for the estate of the deceased on 7th June, 1989. Rahab Michere Nene thereupon filed Cross-petition and Answer to the petition as well as Objection to making of the grant on 17th August, 1984 and 26th July, 1984 respectively.