Search court decisions

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…the period already spent in custody.…

…He essentially argued that his sentence be reviewed to capture the period spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…With respect, there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellants in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…He contends that the trial court failed to take into account the period he spent in custody prior to conviction. The Respondent raised no objection to the application.…

…in custody before they were sentenced… Taking into account the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…With respect there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellants in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…already spent in custody.…

….He states that the 6 months he spent in remand ought to have been taken into consideration.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…the period already spent in custody. 9.…

…With respect, there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellants in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…With respect, there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellants in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…With respect, there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellants in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…It urged the court to take into account the 10 months period she spent in custody prior to release on bond. 2.…

…by the period already spent in custody.…

…With respect, there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellants in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…The Petitioner’s complaint is that the trial court failed to consider the period spent in custody as part of his sentence. as required by law.…

…spent by an accused person in custody.…

…The Applicant now prays that the period which he spent in Remand be deducted from his sentence. 8.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…This translates to a period of approximately nine (9) months, spent in remand custody before conviction and sentence. 16.…

…that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…“Taking into account” the period spent in custody must mean considering that period so that the imposed sentence is reduced proportionately by the period already spent in custody.…

…already spent in custody.…

…The Applicant now prays to have the period which he spent in remand custody deducted from his sentence. 5.…

…With respect there is no evidence that the court took into account the period already spent by the appellant in custody.…