Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
…The application was not opposed by the prosecution.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……………RESPONDENT (Appeal from a conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Lady Justice R Nambuye) dated 26th November, 1992 in HC CR A No 387 of 1992) JUDGMENT The entire case for the prosecution…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…There was nothing wrong in the appellant having in his possession Kshs 18,000 and he did not have to explain how he came to be in possession of that sum of money, especially as the prosecution had not established that the…
…The prosecution never established the circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt could be drawn and in the absence of establishing such facts there could not be a hypothesis of guilt of the appellant.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…That is simply not good enough to establish an essential of the offence, and may, indeed, provide the reason why the prosecution elected to proceed on a charge of rape.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Briefly, the prosecution case was that on the 15th day of September, 1993 at about 6 pm Sgt Malat Ayot (PW1) and PC Roiman Sadara (PW2) both of the Anti-Nacortic Unit of the CID based at Malindi acting on a tip-off, laid…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…There was accordingly consistent evidence by the prosecution witnesses that the appellant took the radio cassette to the house of PW.2 and also that it was the appellant who took the two leopard skins to the kitchen in which…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The appellant however has taken the prosecution witnesses to task. He has pointed out carefully some discrepancies in their evidence.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Their petitions of appeal, filed on the July 23, 1984, each contained lengthy grounds, but in particular attacked their respective identifications by the prosecution witnesses, upon which of course, their convictions mainly…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Their petitions of appeal, filed on the July 23, 1984, each contained lengthy grounds, but in particular attacked their respective identifications by the prosecution witnesses, upon which of course, their convictions mainly…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The evidence relied upon by the prosecution to prove that this photocopy certificate was a forgery was overwhelming.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…By the bringing of the application to substitute the plaintiff it was made clear both to the Court and the defendant that the estate of the deceased plaintiff was desirous of continuing the prosecution of the cause of action…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…Briefly the prosecution case was that on the night of 30th of January, 1993 at about 1 am while the complainant, Kesra Kesina (PW1) was sleeping at his house within Mtomodoni village in Kilifi area, he was awakened from sleep…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…and liable to pay to the person or persons aggrieved by the removal three times the value of the goods, chattels, stock or crops so removed, in addition to any costs incurred by the person or persons so aggrieved in the prosecution…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…O XV1 deals with the prosecution of suits and adjournments. O XV1 rule 4, is instructive. On 9th May, 1989, the suit came for trial. An application for adjournment was made on behalf of the plaintiff, and, was granted.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
….124 K.E.A. which says: "Not withstanding the provisions of Section 19 of theOaths and Statutory Declarations Act, where the evidenceof a child of tender years is admitted in accordance withthat section on behalf of the prosecution…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…That would perfectly be a valid defence to a criminal charge, for the prosecution would be duty-bound to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that it was D.W.1 who was in charge of the Ferry at the time of the accident.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…“for want of prosecution”.…