Search court decisions

…In his petition of appeal the main grounds of complaint are that the learned trial magistrate disregarded his defence; that she convicted him on the basis of conflicting prosecution evidence; that the police officer who arrested…

…It will perhaps be appropriate to set out a summary of the prosecution case as it emerged in the court below.…

…In his petition of appeal the main grounds of complaint are that the learned trial magistrate disregarded his defence; that she convicted him on the basis of conflicting prosecution evidence; that the police officer who arrested…

…It will perhaps be appropriate to set out a summary of the prosecution case as it emerged in the court below.…

…Nonetheless, counsel for the respondent submitted that the intended appeal will only delay the prosecution of H.C.C.C.…

…Whether or not such an appeal will turn on a serious issue or it will only serve to delay the prosecution of the suit in the superior court is not possible to say with any amount of firmness as there is insufficient material…

…This report was prepared by the only prosecution witness, PW 2, George Odera who is a quality controller with the Kenya Bureau of Standards.…

…The defence cannot anticipate what witnesses are to be called by the prosecution. PW 1 the person who took the samples did not testify that he was present at their examination by PW 2.…

…That was for the prosecution to prove. The blood-stain could have come from a person other than the deceased.…

…But in the court, the prosecution did not put forward any reason why the deceased’s blood must be on the back of the appellant’s shirt if indeed it was his shirt. Blood stains are circumstantial evidence.…

…iii) of the Act provides as follows: “185(d)(iii) Any person who acquires, has in his possession, …, any goods which he knows, or ought reasonably to have known to be uncustomed goods, shall be guilty of an offence …” The prosecution…

…The two lower courts found that the appellant was in possession of the goods on his own admission, and the prosecution proved that the goods in question were dutiable.…

…The case for the prosecution against the appellant was that at the material time, he was a postal clerk at Quary Road Post Office, Nairobi. He was working in the money orders section.…

…It was the prosecution case that the appellant and another postal clerk, Wilson Kokeiya Naisamia (original A 3, who was jointly charged with the appellant but was acquitted of the charge), had jointly with the account holder…

…There were two witnesses called for prosecution.…

…Although the witness said the gun found in the vehicle driven by the 3rd appellant was identical to one of those used in the robbery, he could not identify any of the robbers and obviously the prosecution knew there was insufficient…

…There were two witnesses called for prosecution.…

…Although the witness said the gun found in the vehicle driven by the 3rd appellant was identical to one of those used in the robbery, he could not identify any of the robbers and obviously the prosecution knew there was insufficient…

…The trial magistrate after outlining the evidence of the prosecution witness as stated that he believed their evidence but gave no reason for believing it apart from saying that they had nor reason for lying.…

…It was after the trial magistrate had considered and decided on the prosecution evidence, that he rejected the defences as false, again without giving any reasons.…

…The trial magistrate after outlining the evidence of the prosecution witness as stated that he believed their evidence but gave no reason for believing it apart from saying that they had nor reason for lying.…

…It was after the trial magistrate had considered and decided on the prosecution evidence, that he rejected the defences as false, again without giving any reasons.…

…In his grounds of appeal to the High court the appellant complained that the prosecution evidence against him was fabricated lies and unreliable.…

…The key prosecution witnesses were Richard Ng’eno (PW 1) and Peter Munyao (PW 2). Richard was supposed to be the one who saw the appellant lock himself in the toilet and then he called Peter.…

…That would lend weight to the prosecution’s contention that the applicant is likely to interfere with the investigations.…

…I refuse this application and order it dismissed and if Mr Aluoch for the applicant is so inclined, he and the prosecution can have the case mentioned before the trial magistrate with a view to getting earlier hearing dates…

…The foregoing is a synopsis of the prosecution case against the appellant. The evidence upon which the prosecution case was based was as follows.…

…Before having a look at the judgment of the trial judge we would confirm that the prosecution also adduced evidence which indicated a struggle had taken place in the bedroom, there was blood and also bloodstained sheets and…

…The foregoing is a synopsis of the prosecution case against the appellant. The evidence upon which the prosecution case was based was as follows.…

…Before having a look at the judgment of the trial judge we would confirm that the prosecution also adduced evidence which indicated a struggle had taken place in the bedroom, there was blood and also bloodstained sheets and…

…The prosecution’s case was that the shooting and the release of a hand grenade thrown at the deceased were the two incidents which led to the death of the deceased.…

…That the learned high court judge erred in both law and facts by upholding the case for the prosecution as proved beyond the reasonable doubt whereas the burden of proof was not discharged as the law demands in that:- I.…

…This court is not unware of speculation circulating in the country and outside as to the likelihood of success of such a prosecution, but such speculation is totally irrelevant to these proceedings.…

…It is interesting to notice that in these application only one point of law has been argued to indicate that there is no likelihood of success of the prosecution, relating to the consent to prosecute.…

…………PETITIONER AND THE ETHICS AND ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION…….. 1ST RESPONDENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS…………….….…..2ND RESPONDENT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE…3RD RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL…………………..…

…That Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution requires that matters be dispensed with without delay and by delaying the prosecution of the Petition, the Petitioner was denying justice to the Respondents and the public they represent…

…The prosecution say, all the four appellants took part in the robbery on July 30 at the Bacon Factory and that they all prepared to commit robbery on October 11, 1984.…

…When the appellant was confronted with the charge of robbery, he denied it and put the burden of proof squarely on the prosecution.…