Judgment[1986] KEHC 7
Julius Mugo Kiarie & another v Republic
High Court at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO'S 608 OF 1985 and 265 OF1986 (CONSOLIDATED) 1. PETER MAINA NDIRANGU.........................................APPELLANTS VERSUS REPUBLIC........................................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
For all the foregoing reasons, then, I would allow the appeal, I would set aside the learned judge’s order striking out the winding up petition and I would order that the petition should proceed to hearing subject to the Rules being complied with. I would not make any order regarding prayer five in the memorandum of appeal as regards the proposed further advertisements, and I agree that the notice of grounds for affirming the decision should be dismissed.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURST Criminal Appeal No 51 of 1986 Macharia …………………….APPELLANTS VERSUS Republic…………….……RESPONDENT JUDGMENT. Stephen Wainaina Macharia, the appellant, was convicted by a Resident Magistrate, Nairobi (Miss A Angawa) of three counts: Viz: 1.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 3452 OF 1984 JOSEPH MUTUNGA WAMBUA............................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KANTILAL KHIMJI PATEL & ANOTHER..........................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
ORDER This is an application for security, first of all for the decretal sum of shs 148,904.60, and secondly for costs estimated at shs. Thirdly I am asked to make provision for the costs of the application and intended appeal.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
The application which is expressed to be brought under order 94 rule 10 and 11, order XXI rule 22, order XII rule 1 and order XXII rule 11(1) and (2) Civil Procedure Rules was filed on 27th, two days before the date fixed for the sale of goods attached in the suit to recover the amount of the decree. The goods include, an air compressor, two sand blasting units, three air spray guns, three tool kits and some spare parts.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO'S 1290, 1291, 1292 & 1293 OF1985 (CONSOLIDATED) 1. PETER WAFULA SIMIYU ALIAS BOSCO WAGOYE..................APPELLANTS AND REPUBLIC.........................................................................................RESPONDENTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 3586 of 1985 LOCHAB TRANSPORT LTD .........................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS KENYA ARAB ORIENT INSURANCE LTD...............................................DEFEDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO,S1288 & 1239 of 1984 1.L.L 2.P.M.........................................................................PLAINTIFFS VERSUS 1.JARED.A.AYUKU 2.KIPLANGAT ARAP CHEPKUL........................DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Bankruptcy Cause 1A of 1982 Mukesh Kewal Krishnan Rakham Pallan …………………………… Debtor RULING Mr M.K.K.R Pallen, the debtor, is 32 years of age. Between 1979-82 he was engaged in business on his own.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1252 OF 1985 MBUTHIA........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION.................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPLICATION NO 1624 OF 1979 MARTINE APIYO WAINDI …………. PLAINTIFF VERSUS PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING CO LTD & ANOTHER …....……DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller, Nyarangi, JJ A and Gachuhi, Ag J A) CIVIL APPEAL 35 OF 1984 BETWEEN BERNARD GATHIGE NGUAH ……………………..........................…….……………… APPELLANT AND AGIP (KENYA) LIMITED …………………………..................…......……………..…. RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Porter, J ) dated June 17, 1983 In Civil Suit 3224 of 1979) ____________________ JUDGEMENT OF KNELLER, J A I, too, would dismiss the ap
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram:Kneller, Hancox JJA & Platt Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 147 OF 1985 BETWEEN MALONZA.............................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC..........................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Nairobi, O’Kubasu & Aluoch JJ)
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Case
tends as a direction to the Court hearing the application for Order of Prohibition to grant the Order without using its own discretion whether it should do so. The Attorney-General did not need any authority, nor a reminder, that in the light of the opinions expressed by the Constitutional Court he could terminate the proceedings even when coupled with a wet hope that he would do so.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO 2779 OF 1984 MORRIS MWANGI ……. PLAINTIFF versus WILFRED MUTURI …………..
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
(Application for extension of time to file the notice of the intended appeal from an order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (O’kubasu and Abdullah, JJ ) dated May 20, 1985 In Misc Application 72 of 1984 ) _______________ RULING OF THE COURT Mr Theuri asks this court to award him the costs of this reference because he succeeded in persuading the court to reverse the decision of the single judge of appeal, and costs follow the event. He claimed he had done much research into the facts for th
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 2260 OF 1982 NEWSTANLEY HOTEL LIMITED ...................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS ARCADE TOBACCONISTS LIMITED..........................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
would allow the appeal with costs both here and in the High Court, and Local Committee. I would order the commissioner to adjust his assessment as appears may have been envisaged in section 93(2) of the Income Tax Act (cap 470).
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller, Nyarangi & Platt JJA) CIVIL APEEAL NO. 31 OF 1985 BETWEEN RUSSEL CO.