Judgment[1986] KEHC 55
Kigika Developers Limited v Nairobi City Commission
High Court at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.3923 OF 1985 KIGIKA DEVELOPERS LIMITED.........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION...........................................................DEFENDANT RULING This matter originally came before me on an application to strike out the defence. I struck out the defence but as the action was somewhat unusual I refused to give judgment, but directed that the case be set down for
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller, Nyarangi, JJ A and Gachuhi, Ag J A) CIVIL APPEAL 5 OF 1984 BETWEEN BAKSHISH SINGH & BROTHERS ………….………...............…………….. APPELLANTS AND PANAFRIC HOTELS LIMITED ………..…………….....................…………..
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL MISC APPL 136 OF 1986 JOSHUA CHEGE WANYOIKE ……………………………………….….. APPLICANT AND JAMES THIGA MUKURO …………………………..……...…………… RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to serve the record of appeal and the appeal be admitted of time at the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru ( Masime J ) dated December 3, 1983 In High Court Civil Case No 235 of 1982 RULING The applicant was duly served with the notice for the hearing of the application but did not atten
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL MISC APPL 136 OF 1986 JOSHUA CHEGE WANYOIKE ……………………………………….….. APPLICANT AND JAMES THIGA MUKURO …………………………..……...…………… RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to serve the record of appeal and the appeal be admitted of time at the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru ( Masime J ) dated December 3, 1983 In High Court Civil Case No 235 of 1982 RULING The applicant was duly served with the notice for the hearing of the application but did not atten
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram; Platt, JA (In Chambers) CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 130 OF 1986 ( In the matter of an intended appeal ) BETWEEN LOISE WAINARO WAMITI …………………………...……………….. PETER WAINARO WAMBUNYU ) 2.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO'S 608 OF 1985 and 265 OF1986 (CONSOLIDATED) 1. PETER MAINA NDIRANGU.........................................APPELLANTS VERSUS REPUBLIC........................................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
For all the foregoing reasons, then, I would allow the appeal, I would set aside the learned judge’s order striking out the winding up petition and I would order that the petition should proceed to hearing subject to the Rules being complied with. I would not make any order regarding prayer five in the memorandum of appeal as regards the proposed further advertisements, and I agree that the notice of grounds for affirming the decision should be dismissed.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURST Criminal Appeal No 51 of 1986 Macharia …………………….APPELLANTS VERSUS Republic…………….……RESPONDENT JUDGMENT. Stephen Wainaina Macharia, the appellant, was convicted by a Resident Magistrate, Nairobi (Miss A Angawa) of three counts: Viz: 1.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 3452 OF 1984 JOSEPH MUTUNGA WAMBUA............................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KANTILAL KHIMJI PATEL & ANOTHER..........................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
ORDER This is an application for security, first of all for the decretal sum of shs 148,904.60, and secondly for costs estimated at shs. Thirdly I am asked to make provision for the costs of the application and intended appeal.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
The application which is expressed to be brought under order 94 rule 10 and 11, order XXI rule 22, order XII rule 1 and order XXII rule 11(1) and (2) Civil Procedure Rules was filed on 27th, two days before the date fixed for the sale of goods attached in the suit to recover the amount of the decree. The goods include, an air compressor, two sand blasting units, three air spray guns, three tool kits and some spare parts.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO'S 1290, 1291, 1292 & 1293 OF1985 (CONSOLIDATED) 1. PETER WAFULA SIMIYU ALIAS BOSCO WAGOYE..................APPELLANTS AND REPUBLIC.........................................................................................RESPONDENTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 3586 of 1985 LOCHAB TRANSPORT LTD .........................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS KENYA ARAB ORIENT INSURANCE LTD...............................................DEFEDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO,S1288 & 1239 of 1984 1.L.L 2.P.M.........................................................................PLAINTIFFS VERSUS 1.JARED.A.AYUKU 2.KIPLANGAT ARAP CHEPKUL........................DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Bankruptcy Cause 1A of 1982 Mukesh Kewal Krishnan Rakham Pallan …………………………… Debtor RULING Mr M.K.K.R Pallen, the debtor, is 32 years of age. Between 1979-82 he was engaged in business on his own.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1252 OF 1985 MBUTHIA........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION.................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPLICATION NO 1624 OF 1979 MARTINE APIYO WAINDI …………. PLAINTIFF VERSUS PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING CO LTD & ANOTHER …....……DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller, Nyarangi, JJ A and Gachuhi, Ag J A) CIVIL APPEAL 35 OF 1984 BETWEEN BERNARD GATHIGE NGUAH ……………………..........................…….……………… APPELLANT AND AGIP (KENYA) LIMITED …………………………..................…......……………..…. RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Porter, J ) dated June 17, 1983 In Civil Suit 3224 of 1979) ____________________ JUDGEMENT OF KNELLER, J A I, too, would dismiss the ap
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram:Kneller, Hancox JJA & Platt Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 147 OF 1985 BETWEEN MALONZA.............................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC..........................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Nairobi, O’Kubasu & Aluoch JJ)
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Case
tends as a direction to the Court hearing the application for Order of Prohibition to grant the Order without using its own discretion whether it should do so. The Attorney-General did not need any authority, nor a reminder, that in the light of the opinions expressed by the Constitutional Court he could terminate the proceedings even when coupled with a wet hope that he would do so.