Judgment[2012] KEHC 492
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Full-text search is temporarily limited — results match titles and citations only.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
In light of what I have stated, I hereby make the following orders; a) The petitioner shall continue to be held in Lang’ata Women’s Prison or such other place as may be designated by the Minister in terms of section 43(2)(b) of the Citizenship and Immigration Act, 2011 pending her removal from Kenya or pending such time as any claim lodged by her, within 30 days from the date hereof, is determined by a competent authority under relevant legislation. b) The Prison authorities shall ensure tha
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsElection Petition
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
(d) It is just in the circumstances of this case and in the interests of justice that the restraining orders be granted. Opposing the application, the 1st Defendant filed grounds of opposition on 9th July, 2010 which were supplemented by the 1st Defendant’s replying affidavit sworn by Jon Waïn, the 1st Defendant’s Legal Counsel on 15th July, 2010.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Suit
conduct of the defendant’s representatives could not excuse the failure to comply with the unless order the pleading had property been struck out.” The general principle is that orders of the court must be obeyed and a litigant who deliberately and without proper excuse disobeys such an order is not allowed to proceed. Singh Gitau for the Respondent did not come to court to argue his client’s position.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsUnclassified
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case