Judgment[2004] KEHC 831
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Employment and Labour Relationsmiscellaneous cause
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA MISC. APPLICATION NO.527.04 IN THE MATTER OF: EXHUMATION OF THE BODY OF ANNA NAFULA UWE AND PIUS WEYUSIA WAMALABE ……………………………………… APPLICANT VERSUS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ……………………………….……..
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2004 (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA APPELLATE SIDE FRANCIS AGANDA ………………………………………………APPELLANT V E R S U S REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………RESPONDENT Consolidated With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2001 STEPHEN MALIOLO ……………………………………………..APPELLANT V E R S U S REPUBLIC ………………………………………………………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO. 73 OF 2002 DIETRICH BOELLING ….…….……………..
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPPEAL 52 OF 2003 GEORGE OMONDI .……….…………………………..……APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ....….…………………………………...….... RESPONDENT J U D G M E NT George Omondi, the appellant, was convicted for Shop Breaking and committing a felony contrary to Section 306(a) Penal Code.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASE NO 476 OF 2003 REPUBLIC ……………………….………...... APPLICANT VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ………….
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsElection Petition
Appeal went to great lengths to examine the relevant authorities and I totally agree with their conclusion on that issue. However in this case in considering the legal effect of the Act and the rules and particularly sections 14 (1) (a) and 14 (2) the provisions of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act (cap 2) set out namely section 24 and section 33 were not considered.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Civil Suit 74 of 2002 BEATRICE AGOLA OPONDO………...........................................…………………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS SWALEH SALIM SAID………….....................................…………………………..DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO. 95 OF 2003 ALII MARO HERO ………………………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2000 BONIFACE MUTINDA MWEMA ……………………… APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………………………………………………RESPONDENT CONSOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 382 OF 2002 (Being an appeal against Sentence in Criminal Case No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 152 OF 1998 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 139 OF 2002 SOPHIA WANJIKU………………..................…..APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………………....………….RESPONDENT (Appeal from Conviction and Sentence of the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Mombasa, JS Kaburu, SPM in Criminal Case No 3613 of 1998)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 331 OF 2002 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 416 OF 2001 (From Original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CIVIL CASE NO.102 OF 1997 INTERLAND DISTRIBUTORS LTD:::::::::::::::::::::::PLAINTIFF VERSUS P. & JOSEPH MULATYA KIMANI::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: DEFENDANT Coram: R.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CRIM APP 175 OF 2000 JAMES IRUNGU MANYEKI ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT CONSOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 174 OF 2000 PETER NJOROGE WAKABA ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT J U D G E M E N T These two appeals were consolidated and
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA DIVORCE CAUSE NO.9 “A” OF 1996 A M ………………………………………………… PLAINTIFF - versus – Y J M …………………………………………… DEFENDANT J U D G E M E N T The Petitioner A M is a Swiss national who on 31-1-92 married the Respondent a Kenyan citizen in Switzerland. Immediately after their marriage the two came to Kenya and cohabited together at Diani in South Coast of Mombasa.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 104 OF 1999 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL DIVISION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1161 OF 2000 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.986 of 2000 of the District Magistrate’s at Kigumo). JOHN MAINA KAMAU......................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC........................................................................RESPONDENT CONSOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1162 OF 2000 JOSPHAT MURANGA MBOTE........................................APPLICANT